tweetindex
PT

The Brookings Institution ✓

@BrookingsInst · Washington, DC · joined 02 Jun 2010

We equip decisionmakers with nonpartisan research and policy strategies to create a more prosperous and secure country and world.

449 361Followers
4 219Following
113 286Posts total
30.8KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

"The problem is not necessarily Washington’s abandonment of Asia," writes @AndrewIYeo. "The deeper problem is strategic incoherence. U.S. officials continue to identify Asia as a priority while pursuing policies that make sustaining that priority increasingly difficult." 3.6K views · 4 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
New research from the Brown Center on Education Policy explores why fostering intellectual humility in young people is important and how schools can play a central role. https://t.co/8EtwRxJAfG 4.7K views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Introducing "No More Sidewalks: Parenting Today," a new podcast hosted by @McCloskeyAbby that explores the major structural changes impacting raising children in America. https://t.co/dKPcLNFitZ 5.6K views · 7 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
"The Iran war’s greatest risk for U.S.-Africa relations is the strategic distraction that hands competitors a window to deepen their foothold on the continent," writes @LandrySigne. https://t.co/WTzQQAhUzj 6.3K views · 13 likes · 6 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
What role should tariffs play in U.S.-China trade negotiations? Kari Heerman analyzes the U.S.-China Board of Trade's proposal on "non-sensitive" goods and explains why policymakers may face difficult tradeoffs if relief isn't paired with meaningful gains for U.S. exporters. 3.8K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
What does a stronger European role in NATO mean for the U.S.? Michael O’Hanlon explores how greater European defense capacity could strengthen alliance burden-sharing, reinforce deterrence, and continue delivering significant strategic value for the United States. 6.8K views · 12 likes · 9 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

6 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 100K–1M seguidores. alcance comum para o seu porte, reação mais fraca que a maioria.

Mediana de visualizações5 178esta conta5 983mediana para 100K–1M
Alcance, %1.15%esta conta1.49%mediana para 100K–1M
Engajamento, %0.22%esta conta0.93%mediana para 100K–1M
MétricaEsta contaMediana para 100K–1MProporção
Mediana de visualizações por post5 1785 9830.87×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)1.15%1.49%0.77×
Taxa de engajamento0.22%0.93%0.23×

Outras contas desta faixa →   Comparar com outra conta →   Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6.8K27 Aug
3.8K28 Aug
6.3K
5.6K1 Sep
4.7K
3.6K4 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.33%27 Aug
0.21%28 Aug
0.30%
0.16%1 Sep
0.19%
0.22%4 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes61.0%50 in total
Reposts28.0%23 in total
Replies2.4%2 in total
Bookmarks8.5%7 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Contas semelhantes