The Brookings Institution ✓

@BrookingsInst · Washington, DC · joined 02 Jun 2010

We equip decisionmakers with nonpartisan research and policy strategies to create a more prosperous and secure country and world.

449 361Followers

4 219Following

113 286Posts total

30.8KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

The Brookings Institution ✓@BrookingsInst4 Sep

"The problem is not necessarily Washington’s abandonment of Asia," writes @AndrewIYeo. "The deeper problem is strategic incoherence. U.S. officials continue to identify Asia as a priority while pursuing policies that make sustaining that priority increasingly difficult." 3.6K views · 4 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

The Brookings Institution ✓@BrookingsInst1 Sep

New research from the Brown Center on Education Policy explores why fostering intellectual humility in young people is important and how schools can play a central role. https://t.co/8EtwRxJAfG 4.7K views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

The Brookings Institution ✓@BrookingsInst1 Sep

Introducing "No More Sidewalks: Parenting Today," a new podcast hosted by @McCloskeyAbby that explores the major structural changes impacting raising children in America. https://t.co/dKPcLNFitZ 5.6K views · 7 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

The Brookings Institution ✓@BrookingsInst28 Aug

"The Iran war’s greatest risk for U.S.-Africa relations is the strategic distraction that hands competitors a window to deepen their foothold on the continent," writes @LandrySigne. https://t.co/WTzQQAhUzj 6.3K views · 13 likes · 6 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

The Brookings Institution ✓@BrookingsInst28 Aug

What role should tariffs play in U.S.-China trade negotiations? Kari Heerman analyzes the U.S.-China Board of Trade's proposal on "non-sensitive" goods and explains why policymakers may face difficult tradeoffs if relief isn't paired with meaningful gains for U.S. exporters. 3.8K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

The Brookings Institution ✓@BrookingsInst27 Aug

What does a stronger European role in NATO mean for the U.S.? Michael O’Hanlon explores how greater European defense capacity could strengthen alliance burden-sharing, reinforce deterrence, and continue delivering significant strategic value for the United States. 6.8K views · 12 likes · 9 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 100K–1M follower range. ordinary reach for its size, weaker reaction than most.

Median views5 178this account5 983median for 100K–1M

Reach, %1.15%this account1.49%median for 100K–1M

Engagement, %0.22%this account0.93%median for 100K–1M

Metric	This account	Median for 100K–1M	Ratio
Median views per post	5 178	5 983	0.87×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	1.15%	1.49%	0.77×
Engagement rate	0.22%	0.93%	0.23×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6.8K27 Aug

3.8K28 Aug

6.3K

5.6K1 Sep

4.7K

3.6K4 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.33%27 Aug

0.21%28 Aug

0.30%

0.16%1 Sep

0.19%

0.22%4 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes61.0%50 in total

Reposts28.0%23 in total

Replies2.4%2 in total

Bookmarks8.5%7 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.