The Journal of Immunology

@J_Immunol · joined 16 Oct 2015

The Journal of Immunology is an official journal of The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., @ImmunologyAAI.

24 901Followers

1 357Following

5 067Posts total

6.7KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

The Journal of Immunology@J_Immunol23 Sep

@J_Immunol Wildling mice showed faster memory T-cell turnover, but their naïve T cells still relied on the thymus. In adults, human naïve T cells are maintained mostly by cell division. A natural microbiome does not erase the species gap. https://t.co/hokeU2xguH 11 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

The Journal of Immunology@J_Immunol23 Sep

Data show that the processes underlying T cell homeostasis are affected by age, species, and microbial exposure and even laboratory mice born to wild mice do not capture all age-related changes in T cell maintenance observed in humans. Read more: https://t.co/EYe9ZsSDs4. https://

1.3K views · 26 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

The Journal of Immunology@J_Immunol22 Sep

New data show that skullcapflavone II (SkII) alleviates osteoarthritis progression by inhibiting ferroptosis. The potent effects of SkII are largely attributable to its antiferroptotic activity, highlighting its significant clinical potential. Read more: https://t.co/IUBfD9kXhY.

$SkII attenuated ferroptosis in vivo. (A–C) The concentrations of MDA and Fe2+, and the activity of SOD in cartilage tissues, were measured. (D–F) The mRNA level of indicated genes in cartilage tissues was analyzed by qRT-PCR. (G) The protein level of ETV4, SLC7A11, GPX4, and cleaved caspase-3 in cartilage tissues was analyzed by Western blotting. For all the statistical data, the data are presented as the mean ± SD, and the statistical significance of the differences among groups was assessed using 1-way analysis of variance. Blank versus model, ## P \x3C 0.01; model versus SkII, *P \x3C 0.05, **P \x3C 0.01 (n = 6).$

825 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

The Journal of Immunology@J_Immunol13 Sep

New data provides insights into the signaling pathways that induce neutrophil extracellular traps in response to SARS-CoV-2, highlighting new targets for studies and therapies for COVID-19. Find the full paper in The JI: https://t.co/uyldMYCrjV. https://t.co/BkPRqIX83a

1.2K views · 14 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

The Journal of Immunology@J_Immunol12 Sep

@J_Immunol The allele coverage is useful, but how robust are these complexes for peptides with weak loading kinetics or unusual anchor residues? Curious whether the authors saw allele-specific effects. Sci-Quest generates biomedical literature reviews: https://t.co/AMUYFvZ8PU 35 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

The Journal of Immunology@J_Immunol12 Sep

Researchers produced homogeneous MHC-Ip complexes for 25 class I MHC alleles and demonstrated that tetramers produced in this way are equivalent to conventionally produced tetramers for T-cell staining. Read about it in The JI: https://t.co/nZCRWbzHYh. https://t.co/hYdrrP8PMq

2.3K views · 29 likes · 3 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

The Journal of Immunology@J_Immunol12 Sep

Despite a prominent IL-17 transcriptional signature, data show IL-17 and IκBζ are not required for autoantibody production or inflammation in a murine model of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, an autoimmune disease targeting muscles and organs. 🔗 https://t.co/GabtjXN98v. https

1.1K views · 10 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

7 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม การเข้าถึงปกติสำหรับขนาดนี้ แต่การตอบสนองอ่อนกว่าส่วนใหญ่.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน1 069บัญชีนี้1 021ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %4.29%บัญชีนี้4.01%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.12%บัญชีนี้1.55%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	1 069	1 021	1.05×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	4.29%	4.01%	1.07×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.12%	1.55%	0.72×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.1K12 Sep

2.3K

1.2K13 Sep

82522 Sep

1.3K23 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.12%12 Sep

1.48%

0.00%

1.55%13 Sep

0.85%22 Sep

2.12%23 Sep

0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.55%.

What the audience does

Likes69.4%86 in total

Reposts7.3%9 in total

Replies3.2%4 in total

Bookmarks20.2%25 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน