Christian Pyles ✓

@CPyles8

Content Director @FloSports. @FloWrestling. Instagram: @CPyles

35 480Followers

998Following

62 740Posts total

88.5KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

@CPyles8 Unreal numbers. Nothing flashy, just pure domination. 84 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

@CPyles8 Staggering 3.1K views · 32 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

In summary: https://t.co/XI3SbGliKU

GIF

5K views · 98 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

But my favorite and in my opinion the most mind-blowing Cael Sanderson stat is his NCAA tournament dominance. In his 4 NCAA tournaments, his bonus point rate was HIGHER than his regular season bonus rate. Winning 18/20 matches by bonus points at the NCAA tournament. 11.1K views · 79 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

So Cael fried everyone the entire regular season, then proceeded to turn up the heat and was MORE dominant at the toughest tournament of the year. Ok one FINAL mind blowing stat/factoid: 5.4K views · 64 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

At the 2002 NCAA tournament at 197 pounds: Pin, Pin, Pin, Major to make the finals. That's what Cael's OPPONENT (Jon Trenge) did Cael's senior year to make the NCAA finals opposite Cael. Then Trenge was MAJORED in the NCAA finals by Cael, 12-4. 5.6K views · 92 likes · 2 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

I was asked my favorite wrestling stat. I didn't really have one, but I knew every time I looked back at Cael Sanderson's NCAA career, I was pretty mind blown. So here's a few of my favorite Cael stats🧵 51.5K views · 205 likes · 10 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

Everyone knows about Cael's 159-0 record. But you maybe didn't realize his bonus rate was 88%. That's 140 bonus point wins in the 2 point td, 3pt nf era. Of his 19 decisions, exactly FOUR matches were within 3 points. The other 15 decisions were won by 4-7 points. 6.6K views · 66 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

8 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe5 544dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %15.63%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %1.07%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	5 544	924	6.00×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	15.63%	3.62%	4.32×
Interaktionsrate	1.07%	1.52%	0.71×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6.6K4 Sep

51.5K

5.6K

5.4K

11.1K

3.1K

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.08%4 Sep

0.45%

1.75%

1.25%

0.76%

2.07%

1.07%

0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes87.7%636 in total

Reposts3.0%22 in total

Replies4.4%32 in total

Bookmarks4.8%35 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten