tweetindex
EN

Christian Pyles ✓

@CPyles8

Content Director @FloSports. @FloWrestling. Instagram: @CPyles

35 480Followers
998Following
62 740Posts total
88.5KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

@CPyles8 Unreal numbers. Nothing flashy, just pure domination. 84 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@CPyles8 Staggering 3.1K views · 32 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
In summary: https://t.co/XI3SbGliKU
GIF
5K views · 98 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
But my favorite and in my opinion the most mind-blowing Cael Sanderson stat is his NCAA tournament dominance. In his 4 NCAA tournaments, his bonus point rate was HIGHER than his regular season bonus rate. Winning 18/20 matches by bonus points at the NCAA tournament. 11.1K views · 79 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
So Cael fried everyone the entire regular season, then proceeded to turn up the heat and was MORE dominant at the toughest tournament of the year. Ok one FINAL mind blowing stat/factoid: 5.4K views · 64 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
At the 2002 NCAA tournament at 197 pounds: Pin, Pin, Pin, Major to make the finals. That's what Cael's OPPONENT (Jon Trenge) did Cael's senior year to make the NCAA finals opposite Cael. Then Trenge was MAJORED in the NCAA finals by Cael, 12-4. 5.6K views · 92 likes · 2 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
I was asked my favorite wrestling stat. I didn't really have one, but I knew every time I looked back at Cael Sanderson's NCAA career, I was pretty mind blown. So here's a few of my favorite Cael stats🧵 51.5K views · 205 likes · 10 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →
Everyone knows about Cael's 159-0 record. But you maybe didn't realize his bonus rate was 88%. That's 140 bonus point wins in the 2 point td, 3pt nf era. Of his 19 decisions, exactly FOUR matches were within 3 points. The other 15 decisions were won by 4-7 points. 6.6K views · 66 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

8 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views5 544this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %15.63%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %1.07%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post5 5449246.00×
Reach (views ÷ followers)15.63%3.62%4.32×
Engagement rate1.07%1.52%0.71×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6.6K4 Sep
51.5K
5.6K
5.4K
11.1K
5K
3.1K
84

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.08%4 Sep
0.45%
1.75%
1.25%
0.76%
2.07%
1.07%
0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes87.7%636 in total
Reposts3.0%22 in total
Replies4.4%32 in total
Bookmarks4.8%35 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts