Christian Pyles ✓

@CPyles8

Content Director @FloSports. @FloWrestling. Instagram: @CPyles

35 480Followers

998Following

62 740Posts total

88.5KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

@CPyles8 Unreal numbers. Nothing flashy, just pure domination. 84 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

@CPyles8 Staggering 3.1K views · 32 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

In summary: https://t.co/XI3SbGliKU

GIF

5K views · 98 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

But my favorite and in my opinion the most mind-blowing Cael Sanderson stat is his NCAA tournament dominance. In his 4 NCAA tournaments, his bonus point rate was HIGHER than his regular season bonus rate. Winning 18/20 matches by bonus points at the NCAA tournament. 11.1K views · 79 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

So Cael fried everyone the entire regular season, then proceeded to turn up the heat and was MORE dominant at the toughest tournament of the year. Ok one FINAL mind blowing stat/factoid: 5.4K views · 64 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

At the 2002 NCAA tournament at 197 pounds: Pin, Pin, Pin, Major to make the finals. That's what Cael's OPPONENT (Jon Trenge) did Cael's senior year to make the NCAA finals opposite Cael. Then Trenge was MAJORED in the NCAA finals by Cael, 12-4. 5.6K views · 92 likes · 2 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

I was asked my favorite wrestling stat. I didn't really have one, but I knew every time I looked back at Cael Sanderson's NCAA career, I was pretty mind blown. So here's a few of my favorite Cael stats🧵 51.5K views · 205 likes · 10 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →

Christian Pyles ✓@CPyles84 Sep

Everyone knows about Cael's 159-0 record. But you maybe didn't realize his bonus rate was 88%. That's 140 bonus point wins in the 2 point td, 3pt nf era. Of his 19 decisions, exactly FOUR matches were within 3 points. The other 15 decisions were won by 4-7 points. 6.6K views · 66 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

8 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. arriva a molti, ma pochi di loro reagiscono.

Visualizzazioni mediane5 544questo account924mediana per 10K–100K

Copertura, %15.63%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K

Interazione, %1.07%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K

Metrica	Questo account	Mediana per 10K–100K	Rapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post	5 544	924	6.00×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)	15.63%	3.62%	4.32×
Tasso di interazione	1.07%	1.52%	0.71×

Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6.6K4 Sep

51.5K

5.6K

5.4K

11.1K

3.1K

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.08%4 Sep

0.45%

1.75%

1.25%

0.76%

2.07%

1.07%

0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes87.7%636 in total

Reposts3.0%22 in total

Replies4.4%32 in total

Bookmarks4.8%35 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ultimi post

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Account simili