Nathan C. Frey ✓

@nc_frey

on the Second Quest @AnthropicAI | previously CTO & Co-Founder @CoefficientBio (acq. by @AnthropicAI) | ex-@Genentech | @MIT @Penn

7 203Followers

1 536Following

727Posts total

206.2KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey2 Sep

@nc_frey Science fundamentally requires independence and not credentialism. 310 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey2 Sep

@nc_frey It would be nice if it were possible to do 7 hours of work on a subscription 1.9K views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey2 Sep

@nc_frey What qualify as life science? Independent researchers like me, can we apply and get accepted? I published https://t.co/uLdTzhIK7D for example and have a lot more upcoming. 1K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey2 Sep

@nc_frey woah, how do labs get access? 1.1K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey1 Sep

We're launching the Life Sciences Verification Program in partnership with US government so life sciences professionals can use Mythos 5.1 with safeguards designed for R&D. We have enrolled our first participants and plan to expand this program to the broader life sciences 62.7K views · 360 likes · 27 reposts · 38 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey1 Sep

https://t.co/a6mxc1mZ6e 5.5K views · 18 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey1 Sep

I gave Fable 5.1 one of my old grad school papers and it re-implemented the entire thing, reproduced all the calculations, fixed some errors by relaxing approximations we made, derived an analytically solvable model we hadn't considered, and then extended the paper by solving a 133.7K views · 905 likes · 25 reposts · 29 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

7 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse under 10K Follower. liegt bei Reichweite und Interaktion unter vergleichbaren Konten.

Medianaufrufe1 851dieses Konto4 175Median für under 10K

Reichweite, %25.70%dieses Konto250.82%Median für under 10K

Interaktion, %0.69%dieses Konto1.41%Median für under 10K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für under 10K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	1 851	4 175	0.44×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	25.70%	2.5× audience	0.10×
Interaktionsrate	0.69%	1.41%	0.49×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

133.7K1 Sep

5.5K

62.7K

1.1K2 Sep

1.9K

310

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.72%1 Sep

0.35%

0.69%

0.53%2 Sep

0.58%

0.81%

2.26%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes70.4%1 316 in total

Reposts2.8%52 in total

Replies3.7%69 in total

Quotes0.7%14 in total

Bookmarks22.3%417 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten