tweetindex

Nathan C. Frey

@nc_frey

on the Second Quest @AnthropicAI | previously CTO & Co-Founder @CoefficientBio (acq. by @AnthropicAI) | ex-@Genentech | @MIT @Penn

7 203Followers
1 536Following
727Posts total
206.2KViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

7 posts from the last 90 days, next to the under 10K follower range. below its peers on both reach and engagement.

Median views1 851this account2 387median for under 10K
Reach, %25.70%this account160.90%median for under 10K
Engagement, %0.69%this account1.63%median for under 10K
MetricThis accountMedian for under 10KRatio
Median views per post1 8512 3870.78×
Reach (views ÷ followers)25.70%160.90%0.16×
Engagement rate0.69%1.63%0.42×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

133.7K1 Sep
5.5K
62.7K
1.1K2 Sep
1K
1.9K
310

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.72%1 Sep
0.35%
0.69%
0.53%2 Sep
0.58%
0.81%
2.26%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.63%.

What the audience does

Likes70.4%1 316 in total
Reposts2.8%52 in total
Replies3.7%69 in total
Quotes0.7%14 in total
Bookmarks22.3%417 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

@nc_frey Science fundamentally requires independence and not credentialism. 310 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 02 Sep 2026 · Open on X →
@nc_frey It would be nice if it were possible to do 7 hours of work on a subscription 1.9K views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 02 Sep 2026 · Open on X →
@nc_frey What qualify as life science? Independent researchers like me, can we apply and get accepted? I published https://t.co/uLdTzhIK7D for example and have a lot more upcoming. 1K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 02 Sep 2026 · Open on X →
@nc_frey woah, how do labs get access? 1.1K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies 02 Sep 2026 · Open on X →
We're launching the Life Sciences Verification Program in partnership with US government so life sciences professionals can use Mythos 5.1 with safeguards designed for R&D. We have enrolled our first participants and plan to expand this program to the broader life sciences 62.7K views · 360 likes · 27 reposts · 38 replies 01 Sep 2026 · Open on X →
https://t.co/a6mxc1mZ6e 5.5K views · 18 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies 01 Sep 2026 · Open on X →
I gave Fable 5.1 one of my old grad school papers and it re-implemented the entire thing, reproduced all the calculations, fixed some errors by relaxing approximations we made, derived an analytically solvable model we hadn't considered, and then extended the paper by solving a 133.7K views · 905 likes · 25 reposts · 29 replies 01 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

Similar accounts