Nathan C. Frey ✓

@nc_frey

on the Second Quest @AnthropicAI | previously CTO & Co-Founder @CoefficientBio (acq. by @AnthropicAI) | ex-@Genentech | @MIT @Penn

7 203Followers

1 536Following

727Posts total

206.2KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey2 Sep

@nc_frey Science fundamentally requires independence and not credentialism. 310 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey2 Sep

@nc_frey It would be nice if it were possible to do 7 hours of work on a subscription 1.9K views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey2 Sep

@nc_frey What qualify as life science? Independent researchers like me, can we apply and get accepted? I published https://t.co/uLdTzhIK7D for example and have a lot more upcoming. 1K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey2 Sep

@nc_frey woah, how do labs get access? 1.1K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey1 Sep

We're launching the Life Sciences Verification Program in partnership with US government so life sciences professionals can use Mythos 5.1 with safeguards designed for R&D. We have enrolled our first participants and plan to expand this program to the broader life sciences 62.7K views · 360 likes · 27 reposts · 38 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey1 Sep

https://t.co/a6mxc1mZ6e 5.5K views · 18 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Nathan C. Frey ✓@nc_frey1 Sep

I gave Fable 5.1 one of my old grad school papers and it re-implemented the entire thing, reproduced all the calculations, fixed some errors by relaxing approximations we made, derived an analytically solvable model we hadn't considered, and then extended the paper by solving a 133.7K views · 905 likes · 25 reposts · 29 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

7 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de under 10K abonnés. en dessous de ses pairs à la fois en portée et en engagement.

Vues médianes1 851ce compte4 175médiane pour under 10K

Portée, %25.70%ce compte250.82%médiane pour under 10K

Engagement, %0.69%ce compte1.41%médiane pour under 10K

Indicateur	Ce compte	Médiane pour under 10K	Rapport
Vues médianes par post	1 851	4 175	0.44×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)	25.70%	2.5× audience	0.10×
Taux d'engagement	0.69%	1.41%	0.49×

Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

133.7K1 Sep

5.5K

62.7K

1.1K2 Sep

1.9K

310

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.72%1 Sep

0.35%

0.69%

0.53%2 Sep

0.58%

0.81%

2.26%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes70.4%1 316 in total

Reposts2.8%52 in total

Replies3.7%69 in total

Quotes0.7%14 in total

Bookmarks22.3%417 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Derniers posts

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Comptes similaires