tweetindex
ES

BostonSci Cardiology ✓

@BSCCardiology · St Paul, MN · joined 31 Mar 2016

Boston Scientific Cardiology. We invite physicians in the U.S. to learn about our cardiology & electrophysiology therapies and devices. https://t.co/fJylkCb9CX

27 692Followers
3 010Following
9 720Posts total
4.6KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

AFib can place a significant burden on patients, their families and healthcare systems. But meaningful progress is possible through a commitment to better care. This #AFibAwarenessMonth, we recognize the healthcare professionals, researchers and care teams whose expertise, https
449 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
What do the FRACTURE IDE trial results tell us about SEISMIQ™ 4CE (pronounced “force”) Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy Catheter? At #EuroPCR2026, Dr. Margaret McEntegart and Dr. Evald Christiansen discussed the study findings, imaging-guided PCI, and the questions that https:
0:11
746 views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
FRACTURE IDE trial investigators discuss the SEISMIQ™ 4CE (pronounced “force”) Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy Catheter (IVL) and the role of its 4 coronary emitter design in treating complex calcified coronary lesions. Explore the physician interview series: https://t.co/7
0:39
1.2K views · 8 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Is 60 bpm the optimal pacing rate for HFpEF? What workflows support consistent CSP? And why can therapy still be compromised despite ideal lead placement? Hear practical insights from Drs. Friedman, Vijayaraman, and Upadhyay in this on-demand series from #HRS2026. Watch now: htt
0:10
1.1K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Consistent data. Excellent real-world outcomes. AGENT™ DCB continues to demonstrate consistent safety data in real-world practice. With in-patient hospital safety outcomes comparable to DES (drug-eluting stent) in complex ISR and 0% stent thrombosis through 2 years, AGENT has h
0:22
1.1K views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

5 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. alcance normal para su tamaño, reacción más débil que la mayoría.

Visualizaciones medianas1 087esta cuenta924mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %3.93%esta cuenta3.62%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %0.55%esta cuenta1.52%mediana de 10K–100K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 10K–100KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación1 0879241.18×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)3.93%3.62%1.08×
Tasa de interacción0.55%1.52%0.36×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.1K20 Aug
1.1K21 Aug
1.2K25 Aug
74614 Sep
449

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.55%20 Aug
0.36%21 Aug
0.83%25 Aug
1.07%14 Sep
0.45%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes68.6%24 in total
Reposts17.1%6 in total
Bookmarks14.3%5 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares

Frequently asked questions about @BSCCardiology

How many followers does @BSCCardiology have?

27 692 followers.

How many posts has @BSCCardiology published?

9 720 posts.

How do posts by @BSCCardiology perform?

Collected posts: 5. Views: 4 585. Likes: 24.