tweetindex
PT

BostonSci Cardiology ✓

@BSCCardiology · St Paul, MN · joined 31 Mar 2016

Boston Scientific Cardiology. We invite physicians in the U.S. to learn about our cardiology & electrophysiology therapies and devices. https://t.co/fJylkCb9CX

27 692Followers
3 010Following
9 720Posts total
4.6KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

AFib can place a significant burden on patients, their families and healthcare systems. But meaningful progress is possible through a commitment to better care. This #AFibAwarenessMonth, we recognize the healthcare professionals, researchers and care teams whose expertise, https
449 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
What do the FRACTURE IDE trial results tell us about SEISMIQ™ 4CE (pronounced “force”) Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy Catheter? At #EuroPCR2026, Dr. Margaret McEntegart and Dr. Evald Christiansen discussed the study findings, imaging-guided PCI, and the questions that https:
0:11
746 views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
FRACTURE IDE trial investigators discuss the SEISMIQ™ 4CE (pronounced “force”) Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy Catheter (IVL) and the role of its 4 coronary emitter design in treating complex calcified coronary lesions. Explore the physician interview series: https://t.co/7
0:39
1.2K views · 8 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Is 60 bpm the optimal pacing rate for HFpEF? What workflows support consistent CSP? And why can therapy still be compromised despite ideal lead placement? Hear practical insights from Drs. Friedman, Vijayaraman, and Upadhyay in this on-demand series from #HRS2026. Watch now: htt
0:10
1.1K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Consistent data. Excellent real-world outcomes. AGENT™ DCB continues to demonstrate consistent safety data in real-world practice. With in-patient hospital safety outcomes comparable to DES (drug-eluting stent) in complex ISR and 0% stent thrombosis through 2 years, AGENT has h
0:22
1.1K views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

5 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. alcance comum para o seu porte, reação mais fraca que a maioria.

Mediana de visualizações1 087esta conta924mediana para 10K–100K
Alcance, %3.93%esta conta3.62%mediana para 10K–100K
Engajamento, %0.55%esta conta1.52%mediana para 10K–100K
MétricaEsta contaMediana para 10K–100KProporção
Mediana de visualizações por post1 0879241.18×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)3.93%3.62%1.08×
Taxa de engajamento0.55%1.52%0.36×

Outras contas desta faixa →   Comparar com outra conta →   Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.1K20 Aug
1.1K21 Aug
1.2K25 Aug
74614 Sep
449

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.55%20 Aug
0.36%21 Aug
0.83%25 Aug
1.07%14 Sep
0.45%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes68.6%24 in total
Reposts17.1%6 in total
Bookmarks14.3%5 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Contas semelhantes

Frequently asked questions about @BSCCardiology

How many followers does @BSCCardiology have?

27 692 followers.

How many posts has @BSCCardiology published?

9 720 posts.

How do posts by @BSCCardiology perform?

Collected posts: 5. Views: 4 585. Likes: 24.