tweetindex
TH

BostonSci Cardiology ✓

@BSCCardiology · St Paul, MN · joined 31 Mar 2016

Boston Scientific Cardiology. We invite physicians in the U.S. to learn about our cardiology & electrophysiology therapies and devices. https://t.co/fJylkCb9CX

27 692Followers
3 010Following
9 720Posts total
4.6KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

AFib can place a significant burden on patients, their families and healthcare systems. But meaningful progress is possible through a commitment to better care. This #AFibAwarenessMonth, we recognize the healthcare professionals, researchers and care teams whose expertise, https
449 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
What do the FRACTURE IDE trial results tell us about SEISMIQ™ 4CE (pronounced “force”) Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy Catheter? At #EuroPCR2026, Dr. Margaret McEntegart and Dr. Evald Christiansen discussed the study findings, imaging-guided PCI, and the questions that https:
0:11
746 views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
FRACTURE IDE trial investigators discuss the SEISMIQ™ 4CE (pronounced “force”) Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy Catheter (IVL) and the role of its 4 coronary emitter design in treating complex calcified coronary lesions. Explore the physician interview series: https://t.co/7
0:39
1.2K views · 8 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Is 60 bpm the optimal pacing rate for HFpEF? What workflows support consistent CSP? And why can therapy still be compromised despite ideal lead placement? Hear practical insights from Drs. Friedman, Vijayaraman, and Upadhyay in this on-demand series from #HRS2026. Watch now: htt
0:10
1.1K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Consistent data. Excellent real-world outcomes. AGENT™ DCB continues to demonstrate consistent safety data in real-world practice. With in-patient hospital safety outcomes comparable to DES (drug-eluting stent) in complex ISR and 0% stent thrombosis through 2 years, AGENT has h
0:22
1.1K views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

5 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม การเข้าถึงปกติสำหรับขนาดนี้ แต่การตอบสนองอ่อนกว่าส่วนใหญ่.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน1 087บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %3.93%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.55%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์1 0879241.18×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)3.93%3.62%1.08×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม0.55%1.52%0.36×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.1K20 Aug
1.1K21 Aug
1.2K25 Aug
74614 Sep
449

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.55%20 Aug
0.36%21 Aug
0.83%25 Aug
1.07%14 Sep
0.45%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes68.6%24 in total
Reposts17.1%6 in total
Bookmarks14.3%5 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน

Frequently asked questions about @BSCCardiology

How many followers does @BSCCardiology have?

27 692 followers.

How many posts has @BSCCardiology published?

9 720 posts.

How do posts by @BSCCardiology perform?

Collected posts: 5. Views: 4 585. Likes: 24.