Jed Shugerman
@jedshug · Boston, MA · joined 28 Dec 2010
Prof @BU_Law. JD/PhD History & dad jokes. 5th most-cited legal historian, 2019-23. https://t.co/pNx2Rx4e3U https://t.co/Rdnudr0EcV
40 964Followers
1 807Following
39 488Posts total
484.5KViews on collected posts
Últimas publicaciones
Buscando publicaciones nuevas…
Our "Blessings of Liberty" podcast about presidential removal & birthright citizenship is up.
I gave @ilan_wurman a week's notice to address his specific misuses of historical sources.
He dodged.
So I posted the details.
Control-F Around and Find Out.
https://t.co/vR2TNgqSjx
1.7K views · 12 likes
· 1 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
Daily Supreme Court Historical Fact-Check #4:
In Slaughter, Roberts Omitted the Parts of Jefferson's 1780 Notes that Contradicted His Theory https://t.co/u0hB24vLkD
4.2K views · 16 likes
· 1 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
Daily SCOTUS Historical Fact-Check, Part 1:
I'm starting a daily SCOTUS fact-check after a whopper term, full of erroneous historical whoppers.
1. Justice Kavanaugh concurred in the result. Why did he bend over backward to call it a dissent?
https://t.co/UhgqX6BS9A
2.5K views · 8 likes
· 0 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
@jedshug Yes, it's absolutely wild that anyone might disagree with you.
12.1K views · 412 likes
· 3 reposts · 15 replies
Open on X →
Kavanaugh's history is wrong/grossly misleading at p.8.
In the very least, he had a duty to read the briefs (our brief!) & Jackson's concurrence, and he had to address the background of illegal slave trade and the restrictions against Roma & mass Chinese immigration. https://t.c
11.8K views · 74 likes
· 10 reposts · 5 replies
Open on X →
Frankly, I am stunned reading Kavanaugh's dissenting view: the 14th A. does NOT guarantee birthright citizenship.
He did not read the amicus briefs.
He did not even read Jackson's concurrence, which relied on my research to refute Kavanaugh's unsupported assertions (p. 8)
258.5K views · 494 likes
· 60 reposts · 31 replies
Open on X →
I'm also honored that Jackson cited the amicus brief Evan Bernick and I filed, with the outstanding lawyering of @BBenedict33 & Michael Altebrando
https://t.co/N3NsbYKFv5
3.6K views · 18 likes
· 5 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
Gratified that our birthright amicus brief was cited in Justice Jackson's concurrence & that several of its unique sources made it into the Opinion of the Court. This is a huge victory for the rule of law - one that comes along once a century. Thank you to @jedshug & Evan Bernick
4.1K views · 14 likes
· 2 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
My full article here:
"An Originalist Case for Birthright Citizenship: The Inclusion of 'Temporary Sojourners' and of Chinese and Roma"
Forthcoming UC Law Journal (2026)
https://t.co/OFHf8VGm4H
2.8K views · 28 likes
· 5 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
2/ My full article here:
"An Originalist Case for Birthright Citizenship: The Inclusion of “Temporary Sojourners” and of Chinese and Roma"
Forthcoming UC Law Journal (2026)
https://t.co/fndYQHKSgH
4.6K views · 14 likes
· 3 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
The Supreme Court STRIKES DOWN Trump's anti-birthright executive order.
I was honored that Sotomayor cited 5 of my articles in her Slaughter dissent yesterday.
It's a sweeter honor today as Jackson cited my historical work supporting birthright, p. 12-13, forthcoming in UC L.J. h
161.1K views · 166 likes
· 34 reposts · 8 replies
Open on X →
With the outstanding teamwork of Brendan Benedict and Michael Altebrando, Evan Bernick & I proudly filed this originalist amicus brief defending birthright citizenship in Trump v. Barbara:
https://t.co/JUxRXSMEV9
16.7K views · 45 likes
· 20 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño
12 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. llega a mucha gente, pero pocos de esos espectadores reaccionan.
Visualizaciones medianas4 139esta cuenta978mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %10.10%esta cuenta3.48%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %0.56%esta cuenta1.92%mediana de 10K–100K
| Métrica | Esta cuenta | Mediana de 10K–100K | Proporción |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visualizaciones medianas por publicación | 4 139 | 978 | 4.23× |
| Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores) | 10.10% | 3.48% | 2.90× |
| Tasa de interacción | 0.56% | 1.92% | 0.29× |
Otras cuentas de este rango → Comparar con otra cuenta → Cómo se construyen estas referencias →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
16.7K27 Feb
161.1K30 Jun
4.6K
2.8K
4.1K
3.6K
829
258.5K
11.8K
12.1K
2.5K8 Jul
4.2K16 Jul
1.7K23 Jul
Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
0.44%27 Feb
0.13%30 Jun
0.41%
1.25%
0.42%
0.69%
0.60%
0.23%
0.76%
3.56%
0.40%8 Jul
0.52%16 Jul
0.96%23 Jul
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.92%.
What the audience does
Likes72.7%1 306 in total
Reposts8.0%144 in total
Replies4.2%75 in total
Quotes1.4%26 in total
Bookmarks13.6%245 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Cuentas similares
Bookit Sports ✓
@BookitHQ
81.9K followers
· 26.9K posts
Tony Martin
@mrtonymartin
81.9K followers
· 32.3K posts
Jon Root ✓
@JonnyRoot_
81.9K followers
· 40.6K posts
Shreyas Media ✓
@shreyasgroup
81.9K followers
· 95.6K posts
Charity Majors ✓
@mipsytipsy
81.9K followers
· 64.2K posts
Jay Feely ✓
@jayfeely
81.9K followers
· 37.1K posts
José Díaz-Balart ✓
@jdbalart
81.9K followers
· 60.1K posts
Toonami Faithful
@ToonamiNews
81.9K followers
· 91.2K posts