tweetindex
PT

Jed Shugerman

@jedshug · Boston, MA · joined 28 Dec 2010

Prof @BU_Law. JD/PhD History & dad jokes. 5th most-cited legal historian, 2019-23. https://t.co/pNx2Rx4e3U https://t.co/Rdnudr0EcV

40 964Followers
1 807Following
39 488Posts total
484.5KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

Our "Blessings of Liberty" podcast about presidential removal & birthright citizenship is up. I gave @ilan_wurman a week's notice to address his specific misuses of historical sources. He dodged. So I posted the details. Control-F Around and Find Out. https://t.co/vR2TNgqSjx 1.7K views · 12 likes · 1 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Daily Supreme Court Historical Fact-Check #4: In Slaughter, Roberts Omitted the Parts of Jefferson's 1780 Notes that Contradicted His Theory https://t.co/u0hB24vLkD 4.2K views · 16 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Daily SCOTUS Historical Fact-Check, Part 1: I'm starting a daily SCOTUS fact-check after a whopper term, full of erroneous historical whoppers. 1. Justice Kavanaugh concurred in the result. Why did he bend over backward to call it a dissent? https://t.co/UhgqX6BS9A 2.5K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@jedshug Yes, it's absolutely wild that anyone might disagree with you. 12.1K views · 412 likes · 3 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →
Kavanaugh's history is wrong/grossly misleading at p.8. In the very least, he had a duty to read the briefs (our brief!) & Jackson's concurrence, and he had to address the background of illegal slave trade and the restrictions against Roma & mass Chinese immigration. https://t.c
11.8K views · 74 likes · 10 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
Frankly, I am stunned reading Kavanaugh's dissenting view: the 14th A. does NOT guarantee birthright citizenship. He did not read the amicus briefs. He did not even read Jackson's concurrence, which relied on my research to refute Kavanaugh's unsupported assertions (p. 8) 258.5K views · 494 likes · 60 reposts · 31 replies Open on X →
@jedshug Thank God. Also, thank you. 829 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
I'm also honored that Jackson cited the amicus brief Evan Bernick and I filed, with the outstanding lawyering of @BBenedict33 & Michael Altebrando https://t.co/N3NsbYKFv5 3.6K views · 18 likes · 5 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Gratified that our birthright amicus brief was cited in Justice Jackson's concurrence & that several of its unique sources made it into the Opinion of the Court. This is a huge victory for the rule of law - one that comes along once a century. Thank you to @jedshug & Evan Bernick
4.1K views · 14 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
My full article here: "An Originalist Case for Birthright Citizenship: The Inclusion of 'Temporary Sojourners' and of Chinese and Roma" Forthcoming UC Law Journal (2026) https://t.co/OFHf8VGm4H 2.8K views · 28 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
2/ My full article here: "An Originalist Case for Birthright Citizenship: The Inclusion of “Temporary Sojourners” and of Chinese and Roma" Forthcoming UC Law Journal (2026) https://t.co/fndYQHKSgH 4.6K views · 14 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The Supreme Court STRIKES DOWN Trump's anti-birthright executive order. I was honored that Sotomayor cited 5 of my articles in her Slaughter dissent yesterday. It's a sweeter honor today as Jackson cited my historical work supporting birthright, p. 12-13, forthcoming in UC L.J. h
161.1K views · 166 likes · 34 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
With the outstanding teamwork of Brendan Benedict and Michael Altebrando, Evan Bernick & I proudly filed this originalist amicus brief defending birthright citizenship in Trump v. Barbara: https://t.co/JUxRXSMEV9 16.7K views · 45 likes · 20 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

12 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. aparece para muita gente, mas poucos desses espectadores reagem.

Mediana de visualizações4 139esta conta978mediana para 10K–100K
Alcance, %10.10%esta conta3.48%mediana para 10K–100K
Engajamento, %0.56%esta conta1.92%mediana para 10K–100K
MétricaEsta contaMediana para 10K–100KProporção
Mediana de visualizações por post4 1399784.23×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)10.10%3.48%2.90×
Taxa de engajamento0.56%1.92%0.29×

Outras contas desta faixa →   Comparar com outra conta →   Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

16.7K27 Feb
161.1K30 Jun
4.6K
2.8K
4.1K
3.6K
829
258.5K
11.8K
12.1K
2.5K8 Jul
4.2K16 Jul
1.7K23 Jul

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.44%27 Feb
0.13%30 Jun
0.41%
1.25%
0.42%
0.69%
0.60%
0.23%
0.76%
3.56%
0.40%8 Jul
0.52%16 Jul
0.96%23 Jul

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.92%.

What the audience does

Likes72.7%1 306 in total
Reposts8.0%144 in total
Replies4.2%75 in total
Quotes1.4%26 in total
Bookmarks13.6%245 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Contas semelhantes