Publishing with Integrity ✓

@fake_journals · joined 08 Aug 2018

https://t.co/rpv9EmwFAX Publishing with Integrity #PredatoryPublishing, #Papermills, #SellingAuthorships, #Citations, #IF RT != support/agreement

19 403Followers

2 838Following

40 531Posts total

10.3KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Publishing with Integrity ✓@fake_journals22 Sep

Received this email from the Journal of Marketing & Supply Chain Management (ISSN: 2754-6683). One of the formats you can submit is a Powerpoint presentation. This made me wonder, has anybody published a powerpoint presentation in a journal which is considered both high quality

623 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Publishing with Integrity ✓@fake_journals21 Sep

@fake_journals I said that. It's my opinion that they should publish and then retract otherwise they just adapt and publish in another journal. 251 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Publishing with Integrity ✓@fake_journals21 Sep

1️⃣ I received an invite to receive an award, saying "Based on your profile and achievements, you have been selected for an award, to be presented on stage during the ceremony." 2️⃣ This conatct was from somebody who has a job title of "Deputy Manager - Sales and Marketing". Thi

674 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Publishing with Integrity ✓@fake_journals20 Sep

This is crazy. It's right to retract - but it should NEVER have got through the editorial processes. How hard is it to check for things like this. ... I did hear another view (long time ago - can't remember who made the point) that in some ways it is good, as: 1⃣It highlights 5.4K views · 23 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Publishing with Integrity ✓@fake_journals20 Sep

Delighted to have just been informed that this paper has been accepted. Going through copy editing at the moment (so the abstract may change) but very happy to have got this paper over the line as it is a topic that is close to my heart. https://t.co/WfXFXHoF0r

2.4K views · 32 likes · 5 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Publishing with Integrity ✓@fake_journals19 Sep

How difficult should it be to change the authors of a paper? We spend a great deal of time checking what is in a manuscript. Reviewers examine the methods, results and conclusions. Editors assess revisions. Publishers may run plagiarism, reference and image checks. But what htt

911 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

6 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. portée ordinaire pour sa taille, réaction plus faible que la moyenne.

Vues médianes792ce compte924médiane pour 10K–100K

Portée, %4.08%ce compte3.62%médiane pour 10K–100K

Engagement, %0.70%ce compte1.52%médiane pour 10K–100K

Indicateur	Ce compte	Médiane pour 10K–100K	Rapport
Vues médianes par post	792	924	0.86×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)	4.08%	3.62%	1.13×
Taux d'engagement	0.70%	1.52%	0.46×

Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

91119 Sep

2.4K20 Sep

5.4K

67421 Sep

251

62322 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.55%19 Sep

1.76%20 Sep

0.52%

0.59%21 Sep

1.99%

0.80%22 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes61.6%69 in total

Reposts8.9%10 in total

Replies8.9%10 in total

Quotes0.9%1 in total

Bookmarks19.6%22 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.