tweetindex
IT

Publishing with Integrity ✓

@fake_journals · joined 08 Aug 2018

https://t.co/rpv9EmwFAX Publishing with Integrity #PredatoryPublishing, #Papermills, #SellingAuthorships, #Citations, #IF RT != support/agreement

19 403Followers
2 838Following
40 531Posts total
10.3KViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Received this email from the Journal of Marketing & Supply Chain Management (ISSN: 2754-6683). One of the formats you can submit is a Powerpoint presentation. This made me wonder, has anybody published a powerpoint presentation in a journal which is considered both high quality
623 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@fake_journals I said that. It's my opinion that they should publish and then retract otherwise they just adapt and publish in another journal. 251 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
1️⃣ I received an invite to receive an award, saying "Based on your profile and achievements, you have been selected for an award, to be presented on stage during the ceremony." 2️⃣ This conatct was from somebody who has a job title of "Deputy Manager - Sales and Marketing". Thi
674 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
This is crazy. It's right to retract - but it should NEVER have got through the editorial processes. How hard is it to check for things like this. ... I did hear another view (long time ago - can't remember who made the point) that in some ways it is good, as: 1⃣It highlights 5.4K views · 23 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Delighted to have just been informed that this paper has been accepted. Going through copy editing at the moment (so the abstract may change) but very happy to have got this paper over the line as it is a topic that is close to my heart. https://t.co/WfXFXHoF0r
2.4K views · 32 likes · 5 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
How difficult should it be to change the authors of a paper? We spend a great deal of time checking what is in a manuscript. Reviewers examine the methods, results and conclusions. Editors assess revisions. Publishers may run plagiarism, reference and image checks. But what htt
911 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

6 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. copertura nella norma per la sua dimensione, reazione più debole della media.

Visualizzazioni mediane792questo account924mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %4.08%questo account3.62%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %0.70%questo account1.52%mediana per 10K–100K
MetricaQuesto accountMediana per 10K–100KRapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post7929240.86×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)4.08%3.62%1.13×
Tasso di interazione0.70%1.52%0.46×

Altri account di questa fascia →   Confronta con un altro account →   Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

91119 Sep
2.4K20 Sep
5.4K
67421 Sep
251
62322 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.55%19 Sep
1.76%20 Sep
0.52%
0.59%21 Sep
1.99%
0.80%22 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes61.6%69 in total
Reposts8.9%10 in total
Replies8.9%10 in total
Quotes0.9%1 in total
Bookmarks19.6%22 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Account simili