tweetindex
FR

Neeraja Deshpande

@neerajadeshp

policy analyst: @IWF senior contributor: @iwfeatures alumna: @Wellesley, @TheFP, @StandTogether views mine

7 159Followers
5 982Following
20 447Posts total
204.2KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

It's also been debated by scientists. I just think dooming in general has a bad history throughout time, and there's a reason faiths that have withstood millennia advise against it: https://t.co/R4swuSsFzp 3.2K views · 13 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
What frustrates me further is that AI safety doesn't inherently need to be doomer, and there are obvious risks we should be working on ameliorating, but there are all these other beliefs undergirding it that are never made explicit but you have to accept or be called behind the 3.8K views · 12 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Also, the question of whether or not nuclear annihilation of humanity is even possible has been debated by theologians across religions. See, e.g., some very basic links below: https://t.co/O51esZQBb0 https://t.co/UPbGrUiw96 https://t.co/nOvBlSZnVQ 6.7K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
I also believe this with respect to nuclear war and climate catastrophe. Are they risks we should fear? Yes. Are they going to destroy us all? No. 5.4K views · 23 likes · 0 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
@neerajadeshp I don't think calling the possibility of humans dying is science fiction. I think its quite reasonable to say it is very unlikely but individual human societies have had some kinds of extinction in the past. 1.9K views · 100 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
I think it is underdiscussed how much the Sci Fi narrative around AI is ultimately in opposition to the eschatology of ~every major faith. Maybe the AI doomer Sci Fi-ers are right, and everyone else is wrong, but it’s still incredibly underdiscussed. 13.5K views · 67 likes · 5 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →
It takes an incredibly impoverished, materialistic, hubristic, godless view of man to assume that we are so powerful as to be able to wipe ourselves out. There are real security concerns coming from AI, but we can address those without resorting to science fiction. 169.6K views · 351 likes · 26 reposts · 192 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

7 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de under 10K abonnés. en dessous de ses pairs à la fois en portée et en engagement.

Vues médianes5 429ce compte2 492médiane pour under 10K
Portée, %75.83%ce compte157.16%médiane pour under 10K
Engagement, %0.50%ce compte1.49%médiane pour under 10K
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour under 10KRapport
Vues médianes par post5 4292 4922.18×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)75.83%157.16%0.48×
Taux d'engagement0.50%1.49%0.34×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

169.6K9 Sep
13.5K
1.9K
5.4K
6.7K
3.8K
3.2K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.35%9 Sep
0.72%
5.30%
0.64%
0.33%
0.42%
0.50%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.49%.

What the audience does

Likes60.8%579 in total
Reposts3.7%35 in total
Replies25.6%244 in total
Quotes1.9%18 in total
Bookmarks8.1%77 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

9 Sep

Daily snapshots since 09 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Comptes similaires