Neeraja Deshpande ✓

@neerajadeshp

policy analyst: @IWF senior contributor: @iwfeatures alumna: @Wellesley, @TheFP, @StandTogether views mine

7 134Followers

5 966Following

20 323Posts total

23.1KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

Neeraja Deshpande ✓@neerajadeshp9 Sep

It's also been debated by scientists. I just think dooming in general has a bad history throughout time, and there's a reason faiths that have withstood millennia advise against it: https://t.co/R4swuSsFzp 1.9K views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Neeraja Deshpande ✓@neerajadeshp9 Sep

What frustrates me further is that AI safety doesn't inherently need to be doomer, and there are obvious risks we should be working on ameliorating, but there are all these other beliefs undergirding it that are never made explicit but you have to accept or be called behind the 3.1K views · 10 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Neeraja Deshpande ✓@neerajadeshp9 Sep

Also, the question of whether or not nuclear annihilation of humanity is even possible has been debated by theologians across religions. See, e.g., some very basic links below: https://t.co/O51esZQBb0 https://t.co/UPbGrUiw96 https://t.co/nOvBlSZnVQ 4.6K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →

Neeraja Deshpande ✓@neerajadeshp9 Sep

I also believe this with respect to nuclear war and climate catastrophe. Are they risks we should fear? Yes. Are they going to destroy us all? No. 3.3K views · 18 likes · 0 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →

Neeraja Deshpande ✓@neerajadeshp9 Sep

@neerajadeshp I don't think calling the possibility of humans dying is science fiction. I think its quite reasonable to say it is very unlikely but individual human societies have had some kinds of extinction in the past. 1.5K views · 82 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Neeraja Deshpande ✓@neerajadeshp9 Sep

I think it is underdiscussed how much the Sci Fi narrative around AI is ultimately in opposition to the eschatology of ~every major faith. Maybe the AI doomer Sci Fi-ers are right, and everyone else is wrong, but it’s still incredibly underdiscussed. 8.7K views · 49 likes · 3 reposts · 18 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the under 10K follower range. below its peers on both reach and engagement.

Median views3 178this account2 573median for under 10K

Reach, %44.54%this account162.66%median for under 10K

Engagement, %0.69%this account1.44%median for under 10K

Metric	This account	Median for under 10K	Ratio
Median views per post	3 178	2 573	1.23×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	44.54%	162.66%	0.27×
Engagement rate	0.69%	1.44%	0.48×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

8.7K9 Sep

1.5K

3.3K

4.6K

3.1K

1.9K

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.80%9 Sep

5.55%

0.88%

0.39%

0.43%

0.59%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.44%.

What the audience does

Likes73.3%178 in total

Reposts2.9%7 in total

Replies16.9%41 in total

Bookmarks7.0%17 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

Against accounts of the same size

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Similar accounts