SAF ✓
@2AFDN · USA · joined 26 Mar 2009
Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) is a non-profit working to restore, defend, and expand 2nd Amendment rights through litigation. #2A
51 005Followers
588Following
10 574Posts total
84.2KViews on collected posts
Ultimi post
Cerchiamo nuovi post…
ICYMI: The brief from the United States on our Viramontes and Grant AWB cases warrants special attention. Check out our thread on it here:
https://t.co/5x5PB6muLr https://t.co/bClgYn1pmd
708 views · 5 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Last week, we filed an amicus brief in a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court carry permit denial case. Today, we have filed a very similar brief in a New Jersey Firearm Purchaser Identification Card (FPIC) denial case. FPICs are required to possess a firearm in New Jersey. https
2.7K views · 23 likes
· 9 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
Hear from the man himself, Patrick "Tate" Adamiak at the 2026 Gun Rights Policy conference September 25-27!
Tickets are selling out, get them here: https://t.co/WO7bzs6TYd
Thanks to @USCCA, @SilencerShop, @TaurusUSA, @VortexOptics, @Trijicon, @USLawShield, @thecoltfirearms, htt
5.4K views · 36 likes
· 4 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
@CCRKBArms and the JFPO filed an Amicus Brief in the Viramontes/Cook "Assault" Weapons Ban Case.
You can read it here: https://t.co/5BtykVjUix https://t.co/atR5AgSNQ4
730 views · 16 likes
· 4 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
@2AFDN I can't imagine the decision being anything less than 6-3
If course it ought to be 9-0
But there is no way Roberts or scaredy Barrett will be able to waffle here
Still disappointed that it has taken this long
276 views · 9 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Overall, a very strong brief and one which the Court will no doubt find persuasive, even if we will of course disagree on a few points in the analysis.
Thanks to @AAGDhillon, @Arrinba3870, and the rest of the DOJ team for the support. https://t.co/sEG1Jxpbul
1.3K views · 91 likes
· 5 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
Don't love this portion, but it isn't surprising. They still are expected to defend federal laws like the machinegun ban. https://t.co/xXS1Nt0VdH
2K views · 48 likes
· 3 reposts · 5 replies
Open on X →
AR-15s were originally developed for the military, sure, but so were wristwatches and duct tape! https://t.co/NcgXnYybEg
1K views · 72 likes
· 3 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
"The founders would have been astonished at the claim that legislatures may ban arms in common use if those arms can also be used for military purposes." https://t.co/VGTkeD8dkl
989 views · 66 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
The lawful purposes USDOJ identifies:
Self-defense, defense of the nation, defense of the community, training, and hunting. https://t.co/8kiSiupDut
1K views · 64 likes
· 6 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
"Because handguns and rifles are both in common use, Americans have a right to decide for themselves which to use for self-defense and other lawful purposes."
🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/MYrcRoeto5
2K views · 110 likes
· 8 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
USDOJ argues that AR15s are useful for self-defense, but regardless, the test is any lawful purpose, not just personal self-defense.
Correct! https://t.co/c7hVGDg2E5
1.4K views · 85 likes
· 9 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
USDOJ argues that while statistics are not necessary, they too prove AR15 commonality. Cites English, NSSF, Washington Post. https://t.co/zOOHN22tfr
1.4K views · 65 likes
· 6 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Applying their form of the common use test to AR15s, the USDOJ concludes banning them is unconstitutional because they are legal federally, and in all but a handful of states with bans. https://t.co/mi0oztR1G0
1.3K views · 61 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
To their credit, they acknowledge that this could be a problem for preemptively banned new arms, and they offer a differing analysis in that scenario so they can't just have the "one weird trick" method of constitutionality by quickly banning stuff before it has a chance to https
1.4K views · 65 likes
· 4 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Questionable whether legislative actions should really counter the choices of the People. E.g., if otherwise law-abiding people acquire and peaceably keep certain arms in great numbers, even in defiance of laws banning them, why should that popularity be voided by the existence h
1.6K views · 56 likes
· 3 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
100% agree.
Anger at the common use test is actually anger at the Second Amendment's existence. What these courts are actually upset about is the idea that the People have a right to bear arms that the government may not infringe. That right would be an empty one if government
2.4K views · 110 likes
· 8 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Citing Robert Leider, USDOJ argues that history proves that rifles are the quintessential protected arm and were never banned historically, in contrast to other things like Bowie knives and brass knuckles, for which some restrictions existed. https://t.co/cq6OivVs6l
2.4K views · 91 likes
· 5 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
The USDOJ expressly rejects the arguments about "militaristic" weapons. At the founding, there was no distinction. https://t.co/FcA6lYNM3F
1.9K views · 95 likes
· 4 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
The USDOJ has to manage a bit of a balancing act, assisting us in this case while not torpedoing its ongoing defense of federal laws.
They accomplish here by arguing common use can be a measure of whether or not "Congress and a significant majority of the State have long banned
2.1K views · 83 likes
· 3 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
The United States argues that because AR-15s are "unquestionably in common use among law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes," a ban on them violates the Second Amendment. https://t.co/IeEwdBCzQB
2.4K views · 124 likes
· 5 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
Talk about a vibe shift! https://t.co/U509zJNftb
7.2K views · 210 likes
· 17 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
We are of course very grateful to all of the many groups and people who have submitted amicus briefs in our support today, about 40 in total (and more may still arrive before the day is done).
But the brief from the United States warrants special attention, so a thread now on
37.6K views · 224 likes
· 37 reposts · 6 replies
Open on X →
Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione
25 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 10K–100K follower. copertura nella norma per la sua dimensione, reazione più forte della media.
Visualizzazioni mediane1 564questo account950mediana per 10K–100K
Copertura, %3.07%questo account3.31%mediana per 10K–100K
Interazione, %4.92%questo account1.88%mediana per 10K–100K
| Metrica | Questo account | Mediana per 10K–100K | Rapporto |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visualizzazioni mediane per post | 1 564 | 950 | 1.65× |
| Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower) | 3.07% | 3.31% | 0.93× |
| Tasso di interazione | 4.92% | 1.88% | 2.63× |
Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
1.4K4 Sep
2K
2K
1K
989
1K
2K
1.3K
2765 Sep
7308 Sep
5.4K
958
2.7K
7089 Sep
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
7.11%4 Sep
5.98%
5.99%
6.97%
7.08%
7.54%
2.80%
7.63%
3.62%5 Sep
2.74%8 Sep
0.76%
3.24%
1.43%
0.99%9 Sep
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.88%.
What the audience does
Likes88.0%1 940 in total
Reposts7.4%164 in total
Replies2.3%50 in total
Quotes0.8%17 in total
Bookmarks1.5%34 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Account simili
Apocalyptica
@apocalypticafi
102K followers
· 3.9K posts
Royal Marines
@RoyalMarines
102K followers
· 2.8K posts
D.U.N.K. -DANCE UNIVERSE NEVER KILLED-
@dunk_dance
102K followers
· 1.8K posts
Game Changer 👐
@GameChangerSam
102K followers
· 3K posts
عدالة السعودية
@saudi_justice
102K followers
· 16.5K posts
Lucas 🦇 ✓
@vlucasrocha
102K followers
· 166.1K posts
SACHIN KAUSHIK
@upcopsachin
102K followers
· 26.6K posts
Aimee 🤍 ✓
@aime_mwizaa
102K followers
· 95.1K posts