tweetindex
RU

Rob Bensinger ⏹️

@robbensinger · Berkeley, California · joined 19 Nov 2008

@MIRIBerkeley. If we build opaque superhuman AIs, it's likely to get us killed. The least-bad solution is an international agreement like https://t.co/BsSp5beZhp.

16 714Followers
522Following
26 176Posts total
114.9KViews on collected posts

Последние посты

https://t.co/T137jfJedG 543 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
I think posts like this are downstream of not understanding the prediction, and therefore treating it like a black box that emits sentences. Then you find it suspicious when the box doesn't make strong claims about all kinds of random topics that are nearer in time than ASI. But 488 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
My problem with this view is that if a failed AI attack attempt is just evidence that the agents aren’t advanced/ASI enough, then the claim that “ASI would never attack humanity until it was sure it would succeed” is predictively empty. Moreover, if witnessing such a failed http 3.9K views · 45 likes · 1 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
From the people who brought you "really, aren't corporations basically superintelligences already?" and "really, isn't scientific innovation basically recursive self-improvement already?": 1.3K views · 32 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
It's kind of a brilliant way to dodge getting community-noted. Just fucking don't say anything! 1.4K views · 29 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@gcolbourn You have swarms of rogue people, government, institutions etc that have done immense harm already. Where was your outrage? . Go ahead and pause everything. I don’t think you will like your vision of a safe utopia. 1.5K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
We have gone beyond refusing to offer the argument, to refusing to offer the evidence, to now refusing to offer even the position. 2.5K views · 91 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Why the "it's all hopeless, we should just give up and let AI kill us if it wants" arguments are extremely wrong: https://t.co/eW8TZ3NaTw Why the window of opportunity for the international community to do anything about all this is probably closing: https://t.co/O9kyyYeWUQ http 2.2K views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@robbensinger One reason that may be somewhat uncomfortable for many: a lot of the early recognition of the dangers of ASI emerged within the rationalist/EA milieu, and a lot of rationalists/EAs are deeply uncomfortable with politics - especially politics that involves making com 1.3K views · 23 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I think one of the biggest reasons the world is currently sleepwalking into getting ourselves and our families killed by ASI development is that we're not self-aware about why we're doing that. We can see the smarter-than-human AI disaster approaching, but it's a bit foggy why 54.9K views · 486 likes · 91 reposts · 40 replies Open on X →
@robbensinger Yeah, practically zero respect for the problem. I don't know what went so culturally wrong. Anthropic is heavily culturally EA, and the EAs kept pretending to be serious people who engaged in serious ways. Why do they fall so far below the bar of serious engineers o 35.3K views · 204 likes · 7 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
In the future, governments may lose their ability to control the pace of AI development, even if they want to. In my paper, presented at Technical AI Governance @ ICML 2026 @taig_icml, I analyze how. Right now, governments could still pace AI progress, but the window is closing. 9.6K views · 75 likes · 12 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

На фоне аккаунтов своего размера

12 постов за последние 90 дней рядом с диапазоном 10K–100K подписчиков. показывается большему числу людей, чем аккаунты того же размера.

Медианные просмотры1 842этот аккаунт927медиана для 10K–100K
Охват, %11.02%этот аккаунт3.40%медиана для 10K–100K
Вовлечённость, %1.27%этот аккаунт1.54%медиана для 10K–100K
ПоказательЭтот аккаунтМедиана для 10K–100KОтношение
Медианные просмотры на пост1 8429271.99×
Охват (просмотры ÷ подписчики)11.02%3.40%3.24×
Вовлечённость1.27%1.54%0.83×

Другие в этом диапазоне →   Сравнить с другим аккаунтом →   Как считаются эти ориентиры →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

9.6K28 Jul
35.3K7 Aug
54.9K8 Aug
1.3K
2.2K
2.5K4 Sep
1.5K
1.4K
1.3K
3.9K5 Sep
4886 Sep
543

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.98%28 Jul
0.63%7 Aug
1.16%8 Aug
2.28%
0.98%
3.85%4 Sep
0.26%
2.16%
2.60%
1.39%5 Sep
1.43%6 Sep
0.37%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.54%.

What the audience does

Likes71.6%1 016 in total
Reposts8.1%115 in total
Replies4.7%67 in total
Quotes2.1%30 in total
Bookmarks13.5%191 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Похожие аккаунты