Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓

@robbensinger · Berkeley, California · joined 19 Nov 2008

@MIRIBerkeley. If we build opaque superhuman AIs, it's likely to get us killed. The least-bad solution is an international agreement like https://t.co/BsSp5beZhp.

16 714Followers

522Following

26 176Posts total

114.9KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger6 Sep

https://t.co/T137jfJedG 543 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger6 Sep

I think posts like this are downstream of not understanding the prediction, and therefore treating it like a black box that emits sentences. Then you find it suspicious when the box doesn't make strong claims about all kinds of random topics that are nearer in time than ASI. But 488 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger5 Sep

My problem with this view is that if a failed AI attack attempt is just evidence that the agents aren’t advanced/ASI enough, then the claim that “ASI would never attack humanity until it was sure it would succeed” is predictively empty. Moreover, if witnessing such a failed http 3.9K views · 45 likes · 1 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger4 Sep

From the people who brought you "really, aren't corporations basically superintelligences already?" and "really, isn't scientific innovation basically recursive self-improvement already?": 1.3K views · 32 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger4 Sep

It's kind of a brilliant way to dodge getting community-noted. Just fucking don't say anything! 1.4K views · 29 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger4 Sep

@gcolbourn You have swarms of rogue people, government, institutions etc that have done immense harm already. Where was your outrage? . Go ahead and pause everything. I don’t think you will like your vision of a safe utopia. 1.5K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger4 Sep

We have gone beyond refusing to offer the argument, to refusing to offer the evidence, to now refusing to offer even the position. 2.5K views · 91 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger8 Aug

Why the "it's all hopeless, we should just give up and let AI kill us if it wants" arguments are extremely wrong: https://t.co/eW8TZ3NaTw Why the window of opportunity for the international community to do anything about all this is probably closing: https://t.co/O9kyyYeWUQ http 2.2K views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger8 Aug

@robbensinger One reason that may be somewhat uncomfortable for many: a lot of the early recognition of the dangers of ASI emerged within the rationalist/EA milieu, and a lot of rationalists/EAs are deeply uncomfortable with politics - especially politics that involves making com 1.3K views · 23 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger8 Aug

I think one of the biggest reasons the world is currently sleepwalking into getting ourselves and our families killed by ASI development is that we're not self-aware about why we're doing that. We can see the smarter-than-human AI disaster approaching, but it's a bit foggy why 54.9K views · 486 likes · 91 reposts · 40 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger7 Aug

@robbensinger Yeah, practically zero respect for the problem. I don't know what went so culturally wrong. Anthropic is heavily culturally EA, and the EAs kept pretending to be serious people who engaged in serious ways. Why do they fall so far below the bar of serious engineers o 35.3K views · 204 likes · 7 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →

Rob Bensinger ⏹️ ✓@robbensinger28 Jul

In the future, governments may lose their ability to control the pace of AI development, even if they want to. In my paper, presented at Technical AI Governance @ ICML 2026 @taig_icml, I analyze how. Right now, governments could still pace AI progress, but the window is closing. 9.6K views · 75 likes · 12 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

12 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงต่อคนมากกว่าบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน1 842บัญชีนี้927ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %11.02%บัญชีนี้3.40%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.27%บัญชีนี้1.54%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	1 842	927	1.99×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	11.02%	3.40%	3.24×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.27%	1.54%	0.83×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

9.6K28 Jul

35.3K7 Aug

54.9K8 Aug

1.3K

2.2K

2.5K4 Sep

1.5K

1.4K

1.3K

3.9K5 Sep

4886 Sep

543

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.98%28 Jul

0.63%7 Aug

1.16%8 Aug

2.28%

0.98%

3.85%4 Sep

0.26%

2.16%

2.60%

1.39%5 Sep

1.43%6 Sep

0.37%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.54%.

What the audience does

Likes71.6%1 016 in total

Reposts8.1%115 in total

Replies4.7%67 in total

Quotes2.1%30 in total

Bookmarks13.5%191 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน