Clark Neily ✓

@ConLawWarrior · Washington, DC · joined 30 Jul 2013

Senior VP @CatoInstitute / Constitutional & Legal Studies. Bane of bureaucrats & lover of liberty. https://t.co/w2vtdwOakU

23 425Followers

987Following

49 095Posts total

51.3KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

Clark Neily ✓@ConLawWarrior4 Sep

Every. Single. Time. In-LEOs-we-trust crowd: You guys vastly overstate the risk of Flock, civil forfeiture, mass plea bargaining, coerced confessions, etc. Us: That’s easy to say when you bear zero share of that risk. How about we cut you in for a fat slice? LC: Hey, now… 2.2K views · 52 likes · 7 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Clark Neily ✓@ConLawWarrior4 Sep

Want to know why we have jury independence, which includes the power to acquit against the evidence to prevent injustice? Because of idiot prosecutions like the one on the left, and idiot laws like the one on the right. That’s why. Prosecutors routinely choose not to bring http

3.5K views · 85 likes · 18 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Clark Neily ✓@ConLawWarrior4 Sep

@ConLawWarrior “It is presumed, that juries are the best judges of facts; it is, on the other hand, presumed that courts are the best judges of law. But still both objects are lawfully within your power of decision. You have nevertheless a right to take upon yourselves to judge o 733 views · 18 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Clark Neily ✓@ConLawWarrior4 Sep

@ConLawWarrior If they convict and the evidence does not support that decision it can be reversed on appeal. If they acquit despite evidence of guilt that is permitted. We call that jury nullification. 403 views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Clark Neily ✓@ConLawWarrior4 Sep

Civics tip: If someone tells you criminal jurors are “required” to follow the judge’s instructions, ask what happens if they don’t. And the answer—as long as the juror keeps their mouth shut and simply votes their conscience without explaining why—is NOTHING. Some “requirement.” 10.1K views · 161 likes · 12 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →

Clark Neily ✓@ConLawWarrior4 Sep

Memo to Flockies: “One cop watching you for a fleeting second on the street is not a search; therefore, tens of thousands of cops using AI-enhanced pervasive surveillance tech to track your every movement in a vehicle to which you have been forced to attach a government-issued 7.1K views · 279 likes · 47 reposts · 19 replies Open on X →

Clark Neily ✓@ConLawWarrior14 Jul 2025

@ConLawWarrior Another injustice is that federal courts are still using the Allen charge, a supplemental jury instruction that may be used at the judge's discretion if a jury cannot reach a unanimous verdict. At least twenty-three states have outlawed this practice as coercive an 389 views · 17 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Clark Neily ✓@ConLawWarrior23 May 2025

@ConLawWarrior I supported the "Fully Informed Jury Association" (FIJA), but it disappeared. I believe that if more Americans knew of this right, our justice system would be better. 484 views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Clark Neily ✓@ConLawWarrior23 May 2025

@ConLawWarrior In most cases, juries are instructed to NOT consider possible punishment. 673 views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Clark Neily ✓@ConLawWarrior23 May 2025

One of the Constitution’ most brilliant features is that govt can’t punish anyone without persuading 12 members of the community—unanimously—that the person not only violated the law but also *deserves* whatever punishment the govt proposes to inflict. And the judiciary burned 25.7K views · 189 likes · 30 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown far beyond its own audience, and the audience reacts.

Median views2 836this account924median for 10K–100K

Reach, %12.11%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %2.87%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	2 836	924	3.07×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	12.11%	3.62%	3.34×
Engagement rate	2.87%	1.52%	1.88×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

25.7K23 May

673

484

38914 Jul

7.1K4 Sep

10.1K

403

733

3.5K

2.2K

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.91%23 May

1.49%

2.27%

5.14%14 Jul

4.90%4 Sep

1.89%

2.98%

2.73%

3.18%

2.76%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes76.7%829 in total

Reposts10.7%116 in total

Replies5.7%62 in total

Quotes0.8%9 in total

Bookmarks6.0%65 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

Against accounts of the same size

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Similar accounts