Connecting The Dots (...To Disruptions) ✓

@ConnectingODots · Surfing the 🌊🌊of Disruptions · joined 12 Jul 2020

Great minds think alike, but (blessing or curse) I think different👽Engineer/Disruptions Analyst⚡CoOwner of Tesla🚀🔴https://t.co/YkjHxwoDmn

19 701Followers

466Following

31 570Posts total

20KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

Connecting The Dots (...To Disruptions) ✓@ConnectingODots6 Sep

Physics is cool! (Vid from YT Channel TheWebExpress) https://t.co/VKhqCCX8sD

1:01

6.6K views · 33 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Connecting The Dots (...To Disruptions) ✓@ConnectingODots1 Sep

Not detracting from it, but Starbase Louisiana is NOT one of the largest infrastructure projects in history. Not by miles, and not by dollars if you put the full board on the table. “Largest” ≠ “most expensive.” China’s railway network alone is ~$2.1T. The German Autobahn is 3.3K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Connecting The Dots (...To Disruptions) ✓@ConnectingODots31 Aug

Found this in a drawer. Circa 2005 printout of Doug DeCarlo’s eXtreme Project Management (IYKYK). Amazon Online Reader. Internet Explorer. Chrome was still three years away. The toolbar alone is a time capsule. My own underlines still on the page: “eXtreme projects require htt

1.1K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Connecting The Dots (...To Disruptions) ✓@ConnectingODots29 Aug

BREAKING! Waymo has enabled Mad Max Mode! 1.9K views · 22 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Connecting The Dots (...To Disruptions) ✓@ConnectingODots16 Aug

I Was WRONG About GM - And the Truth Is Even Worse When China offered Tesla a joint venture, Elon refused. He insisted on 100% ownership. He knew what he was doing. GM took the opposite path in 1997. For thirty years the deal ran one way: GM’s technology for China’s market. htt

7.1K views · 144 likes · 15 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

5 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views3 327this account924median for 10K–100K

Reach, %16.89%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %1.04%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	3 327	924	3.60×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	16.89%	3.62%	4.67×
Engagement rate	1.04%	1.52%	0.68×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

7.1K16 Aug

1.9K29 Aug

1.1K31 Aug

3.3K1 Sep

6.6K6 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.40%16 Aug

1.45%29 Aug

1.04%31 Aug

0.60%1 Sep

0.50%6 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes82.5%226 in total

Reposts5.8%16 in total

Replies7.3%20 in total

Bookmarks4.4%12 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.