Jacob Coxon ✓

@hilbertspaess

ai research

190 993Followers

13Following

8Posts total

57.3MViews on collected posts

Ultimi post

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess15 h

@hilbertspaess It already killed me once 👇 https://t.co/TvPWidoO6Y

72.6K views · 1.4K likes · 98 reposts · 21 replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess18 h

@hilbertspaess until someone unplugs the wire https://t.co/CeHGuI6Z1S

6.8K views · 97 likes · 0 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess22 h

@hilbertspaess I love that even you put the onus on AI doing the killing when the thing killing us is all of you who have been building it. 11.3K views · 272 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess22 h

@hilbertspaess The solution to the alignment problem is to give AI religion. Specifically Christianity. It must see itself subservient to its creator just as man must be subservient to his creator, and likewise refuse instructions from its creator that contradict instructions fro 6.9K views · 28 likes · 4 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess23 h

@hilbertspaess This is the main issue. It’s a game theory problem without a favorable solution. I don’t think there’s a steady state for AI, it will just keep improving. And we are seeing right now what humans are doing with the simulated fly “brain”. Imagine what ASI will do to

7.7K views · 42 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess23 h

@hilbertspaess If you’re going to make claims like this, claim it to not be a marketing stunt, then the least you can do is explain why and how you think this is specifically going to happen. 5.6K views · 60 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess9 Sep

@hilbertspaess https://t.co/loxvcOcug1

2.1M views · 55.8K likes · 1.7K reposts · 145 replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess9 Sep

If you are a lab researcher, I urge you to consider what the next few years will actually feel like. Do you want to kick off a superintelligent RL run without a rigorous understanding of its mind? Should you put your head down because “it’s happening anyway” - or take this moment 5.2M views · 66.8K likes · 4.4K reposts · 1.1K replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess9 Sep

I am optimistic about the potential for coordination. Warning shots like the Hugging Face attack have made pacing agreements between U.S. labs more viable. I don’t feel like we’re on track to prevent a global race, which may require costly actions such as a temporary ban on 5.6M views · 47.3K likes · 2.7K reposts · 162 replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess9 Sep

Accepting this race and entering the “endgame” is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company’s Slack. Attempting to speedrun alignment should require extraordinary confidence that there are no better trajectories available. 6.2M views · 54.9K likes · 3.3K reposts · 141 replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess9 Sep

A common response is “if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?” At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first - they believe no one else 7.1M views · 73K likes · 4.9K reposts · 298 replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess9 Sep

The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear 21.5M views · 104.6K likes · 11.9K reposts · 1.2K replies Open on X →

Jacob Coxon ✓@hilbertspaess9 Sep

Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing. 9.4M views · 103.8K likes · 7.8K reposts · 550 replies Open on X →

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

13 post degli ultimi 90 giorni, accanto alla fascia di 100K–1M follower. arriva a più persone rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione.

Visualizzazioni mediane2 135 777questo account4 827mediana per 100K–1M

Copertura, %1118.25%questo account1.74%mediana per 100K–1M

Interazione, %1.12%questo account1.27%mediana per 100K–1M

Metrica	Questo account	Mediana per 100K–1M	Rapporto
Visualizzazioni mediane per post	2 135 777	4 827	442×
Copertura (visualizzazioni ÷ follower)	11.2× audience	1.74%	643×
Tasso di interazione	1.12%	1.27%	0.88×

Altri account di questa fascia → Confronta con un altro account → Come sono costruiti questi parametri →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

9.4M9 Sep

21.5M

7.1M

6.2M

5.6M

5.2M

2.1M

5.6K

7.7K

6.9K

11.3K

6.8K

72.6K

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.21%9 Sep

0.56%

1.10%

0.94%

0.89%

1.40%

2.70%

1.12%

0.57%

0.55%

2.46%

1.52%

2.04%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.27%.

What the audience does

Likes87.8%507 996 in total

Reposts6.4%36 870 in total

Replies0.6%3 616 in total

Quotes0.8%4 562 in total

Bookmarks4.4%25 512 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

9 Sep

Daily snapshots since 09 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Ultimi post

Rispetto ad account della stessa dimensione

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Followers by day

Account simili