tweetindex
EN

Jacob Coxon

@hilbertspaess

ai research

163 214Followers
13Following
7Posts total
151.7MViews on collected posts

Latest posts

@hilbertspaess It already killed me once 👇 https://t.co/TvPWidoO6Y
57.5K views · 1K likes · 76 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess until someone unplugs the wire https://t.co/CeHGuI6Z1S
6.8K views · 97 likes · 0 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess I love that even you put the onus on AI doing the killing when the thing killing us is all of you who have been building it. 11.3K views · 272 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess The solution to the alignment problem is to give AI religion. Specifically Christianity. It must see itself subservient to its creator just as man must be subservient to his creator, and likewise refuse instructions from its creator that contradict instructions fro 6.9K views · 28 likes · 4 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess This is the main issue. It’s a game theory problem without a favorable solution. I don’t think there’s a steady state for AI, it will just keep improving. And we are seeing right now what humans are doing with the simulated fly “brain”. Imagine what ASI will do to
7.7K views · 42 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess If you’re going to make claims like this, claim it to not be a marketing stunt, then the least you can do is explain why and how you think this is specifically going to happen. 5.6K views · 60 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess https://t.co/loxvcOcug1
1.9M views · 49.9K likes · 1.5K reposts · 129 replies Open on X →
If you are a lab researcher, I urge you to consider what the next few years will actually feel like. Do you want to kick off a superintelligent RL run without a rigorous understanding of its mind? Should you put your head down because “it’s happening anyway” - or take this moment 4.5M views · 58.1K likes · 3.7K reposts · 984 replies Open on X →
I am optimistic about the potential for coordination. Warning shots like the Hugging Face attack have made pacing agreements between U.S. labs more viable. I don’t feel like we’re on track to prevent a global race, which may require costly actions such as a temporary ban on 4.9M views · 41K likes · 2.3K reposts · 137 replies Open on X →
Accepting this race and entering the “endgame” is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company’s Slack. Attempting to speedrun alignment should require extraordinary confidence that there are no better trajectories available. 5.4M views · 47.6K likes · 2.7K reposts · 125 replies Open on X →
A common response is “if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?” At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first - they believe no one else 6.2M views · 63.5K likes · 4.1K reposts · 274 replies Open on X →
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear 18.6M views · 90.7K likes · 10.2K reposts · 984 replies Open on X →
Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing. 8.2M views · 90.1K likes · 6.6K reposts · 469 replies Open on X →
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below. 101.9M views · 584.8K likes · 115.2K reposts · 13K replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

14 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 100K–1M follower range. shown to more people than peers of the same size.

Median views3 214 434this account4 851median for 100K–1M
Reach, %1969.46%this account1.71%median for 100K–1M
Engagement, %1.11%this account1.25%median for 100K–1M
MetricThis accountMedian for 100K–1MRatio
Median views per post3 214 4344 851663×
Reach (views ÷ followers)19.7× audience1.71%1 152×
Engagement rate1.11%1.25%0.88×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

101.9M9 Sep
8.2M
18.6M
6.2M
5.4M
4.9M
4.5M
1.9M
5.6K
7.7K
6.9K
11.3K
6.8K
57.5K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.73%9 Sep
1.20%
0.56%
1.10%
0.93%
0.88%
1.39%
2.74%
1.12%
0.57%
0.55%
2.46%
1.52%
1.99%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.25%.

What the audience does

Likes70.6%1 027 420 in total
Reposts10.1%146 353 in total
Replies1.1%16 132 in total
Quotes2.1%30 432 in total
Bookmarks16.2%235 125 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts