tweetindex
RU

Jacob Coxon

@hilbertspaess

ai research

174 676Followers
13Following
7Posts total
163.7MViews on collected posts

Последние посты

@hilbertspaess It already killed me once 👇 https://t.co/TvPWidoO6Y
57.5K views · 1K likes · 76 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess until someone unplugs the wire https://t.co/CeHGuI6Z1S
6.8K views · 97 likes · 0 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess I love that even you put the onus on AI doing the killing when the thing killing us is all of you who have been building it. 11.3K views · 272 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess The solution to the alignment problem is to give AI religion. Specifically Christianity. It must see itself subservient to its creator just as man must be subservient to his creator, and likewise refuse instructions from its creator that contradict instructions fro 6.9K views · 28 likes · 4 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess This is the main issue. It’s a game theory problem without a favorable solution. I don’t think there’s a steady state for AI, it will just keep improving. And we are seeing right now what humans are doing with the simulated fly “brain”. Imagine what ASI will do to
7.7K views · 42 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess If you’re going to make claims like this, claim it to not be a marketing stunt, then the least you can do is explain why and how you think this is specifically going to happen. 5.6K views · 60 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@hilbertspaess https://t.co/loxvcOcug1
2M views · 52.3K likes · 1.6K reposts · 133 replies Open on X →
If you are a lab researcher, I urge you to consider what the next few years will actually feel like. Do you want to kick off a superintelligent RL run without a rigorous understanding of its mind? Should you put your head down because “it’s happening anyway” - or take this moment 4.8M views · 61.7K likes · 4K reposts · 1K replies Open on X →
Accepting this race and entering the “endgame” is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company’s Slack. Attempting to speedrun alignment should require extraordinary confidence that there are no better trajectories available. 5.8M views · 50.7K likes · 3K reposts · 130 replies Open on X →
I am optimistic about the potential for coordination. Warning shots like the Hugging Face attack have made pacing agreements between U.S. labs more viable. I don’t feel like we’re on track to prevent a global race, which may require costly actions such as a temporary ban on 5.2M views · 43.6K likes · 2.5K reposts · 150 replies Open on X →
A common response is “if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?” At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first - they believe no one else 6.6M views · 67.4K likes · 4.4K reposts · 285 replies Open on X →
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear 19.8M views · 96.3K likes · 10.9K reposts · 1.1K replies Open on X →
Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing. 8.7M views · 95.7K likes · 7.1K reposts · 503 replies Open on X →
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below. 110.7M views · 616.5K likes · 122.1K reposts · 13.8K replies Open on X →

На фоне аккаунтов своего размера

14 постов за последние 90 дней рядом с диапазоном 100K–1M подписчиков. показывается большему числу людей, чем аккаунты того же размера.

Медианные просмотры3 394 211этот аккаунт4 785медиана для 100K–1M
Охват, %1943.15%этот аккаунт1.71%медиана для 100K–1M
Вовлечённость, %1.11%этот аккаунт1.26%медиана для 100K–1M
ПоказательЭтот аккаунтМедиана для 100K–1MОтношение
Медианные просмотры на пост3 394 2114 785709×
Охват (просмотры ÷ подписчики)19.4× audience1.71%1 136×
Вовлечённость1.11%1.26%0.88×

Другие в этом диапазоне →   Сравнить с другим аккаунтом →   Как считаются эти ориентиры →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

110.7M9 Sep
8.7M
19.8M
6.6M
5.2M
5.8M
4.8M
2M
5.6K
7.7K
6.9K
11.3K
6.8K
57.5K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.70%9 Sep
1.20%
0.56%
1.10%
0.89%
0.94%
1.39%
2.72%
1.12%
0.57%
0.55%
2.46%
1.52%
1.99%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.26%.

What the audience does

Likes70.7%1 085 687 in total
Reposts10.1%155 650 in total
Replies1.1%17 107 in total
Quotes2.0%30 432 in total
Bookmarks16.1%246 968 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Похожие аккаунты