tweetindex
EN

ASPB ✓

@ASPB · Rockville, MD · joined 08 Dec 2008

We are the American Society of Plant Biologists - Posts and links are for informational purposes and do not necessarily reflect the views of ASPB.

23 542Followers
4 399Following
18 440Posts total
3.9KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

How can plant science journals expand the reviewer community and support the people mentoring new reviewers? As #PeerReviewWeek closes, what one change would build capacity while maintaining quality? Thank you, reviewers and editors. #PRW2026 https://t.co/xGnIhJ4XEp
Graphic inviting researchers to join #PeerReviewWeek by answering the question “What one change would build capacity while maintaining quality?” and thanking ASPB peer reviewers for Plant Physiology, The Plant Cell, and Plant Direct.
733 views · 4 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
This week’s Signal Edition (9/17/26) is out!🌱 👉Read more: https://t.co/o1vGHdFlWF #PlantScience #PlantSci https://t.co/bWoCvaqTJM
Newsletter header reading "THE SIGNAL" with the American Society of Plant Biologists circular seal at left over a watercolor botanical background and a green footer bar showing the date September 17, 2026.
755 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Considering quality in peer review, how should reviewers distinguish experiments essential to a paper’s conclusions from those that would simply be interesting? #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2026 https://t.co/DryTuTCXTo
Call to discuss what makes a peer review useful when quality is the focus, inviting responses with #PeerReviewWeek and thanking ASPB reviewers for Plant Physiology, The Plant Cell, and Plant Direct, with ASPB and Peer Review Week logos.
757 views · 3 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
What would help you say yes to your next peer review invitation? More time? A closer expertise match? Recognition for the work? #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2026 https://t.co/JHvcTGUAtt
Graphic asking "What would make it easier to say yes to a peer review invitation?" and inviting responses with #PeerReviewWeek, with ASPB and Peer Review Week logos and a brief thank-you to reviewers for several plant journals.
682 views · 4 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
📣The Program Committee invites you to submit proposals and abstracts for #PlantBio2027! The Plant Biology conference is developed for the plant science community, by members of the plant science community.🌱 Learn more and submit your content👉️ https://t.co/orFNkMvVWL... https:
0:05
928 views · 9 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

5 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. ordinary reach for its size, weaker reaction than most.

Median views755this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %3.21%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.95%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post7559240.82×
Reach (views ÷ followers)3.21%3.62%0.89×
Engagement rate0.95%1.52%0.63×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

92816 Sep
682
75717 Sep
75518 Sep
733

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.19%16 Sep
1.03%
0.79%17 Sep
0.93%18 Sep
0.95%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes61.0%25 in total
Reposts29.3%12 in total
Replies2.4%1 in total
Bookmarks7.3%3 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts