tweetindex
EN

ClaireBerlinski.substack.com

@ClaireBerlinski · Paris, Rootless cosmopolitan. · joined 16 Oct 2009

Elite creds. Interesting jobs. Writes books. Good-looking. If you like my Twitter feed, you'll love the Cosmopolitan Globalist: https://t.co/B0rpQBYjMG

24 947Followers
1 528Following
101 872Posts total
39.3KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

It's the second-biggest. But otherwise, this point is absolutely correct. I will never understand--and neither will historians--how Congress allowed this to continue. In all of US history there has never been a greater dereliction of duty. Perhaps in all of history, period. 1.2K views · 9 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@harryjsisson @SpeakerJohnson @LeaderJohnThune @SenSchumer @RepJeffries Look at the above postings from today alone. Do you guys really think this obvious NUT Trump should be in charge of the USA and the world's biggest nuclear arsenal? Shouldn't you ........ REMOVE HIM? 3.9K views · 72 likes · 9 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Yeah, nothing to worry about here. 1K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Yeah, nothing to worry about here. 1.3K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The Parlor Trick, by @ClaireBerlinski https://t.co/bq4aZYKiiB My father (a philosopher of mind) and I had a chat with ChatGPT about the nature of its mind and ours. It was *so* interesting. 1.1K views · 3 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Obviously the question is who are the orcas and who is the polar bear. Also, apparently, this never happens. 23.2K views · 210 likes · 27 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →
Count the paraphasias. Trump must have a rigorous, independent neuropsychiatric exam, and must transparently share the results, if not with the public, then with Congress. This is too dangerous to continue. https://t.co/BUCKx99Dvs https://t.co/XlOq5SG4gB
7.6K views · 16 likes · 5 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views1 236this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %4.95%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.76%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post1 2369241.34×
Reach (views ÷ followers)4.95%3.62%1.37×
Engagement rate0.76%1.52%0.50×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

7.6K20 Dec
23.2K29 Aug
1.1K30 Aug
1.3K
1K
3.9K7 Sep
1.2K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.30%20 Dec
1.11%29 Aug
0.53%30 Aug
0.24%
0.10%
2.18%7 Sep
0.99%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes79.4%313 in total
Reposts11.4%45 in total
Replies5.6%22 in total
Quotes2.0%8 in total
Bookmarks1.5%6 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts