tweetindex
EN

Davide Capodanno ✓

@DFCapodanno · Catania, Sicily · joined 06 Mar 2019

Professor of Cardiology at University of Catania, Italy. Editor-in-Chief of @EuroInterventio.

22 997Followers
697Following
2 497Posts total
179.2KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

Published in the NEJM, three letters raise important points about CHAMPION-AF: 1) The primary endpoint includes cardiovascular death (42% of events), which is a “dilutive” component that does not characterize either treatment arm and favors a finding of noninferiority. 2) https:/
29.8K views · 72 likes · 22 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
The day after the announcement of the neutral results of HORIZON Lp(a), and while keeping in mind that nobody has yet seen the final results (although, in practical and regulatory terms, that may matter little), much of the discussion is focusing on Lp(a) as a prognostic https://
15.4K views · 156 likes · 36 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →
Novartis today announced that the phase III Lp(a)HORIZON trial of pelacarsen did not meet its primary endpoint of 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events in 8,323 patients with elevated Lp(a) and established CVD. Three things were once said to be certain in life: death, http
22K views · 170 likes · 46 reposts · 24 replies Open on X →
@DFCapodanno What about Pulnovo’s PADN study? Sounds a lot more game-changing that of these… 617 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@DFCapodanno Incredible volume. 1.3K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@DFCapodanno congrats to everyone behind these trials simultaneous NEJM publications like this dont happen by accident thats a lot of coordinated work 1K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
An incredible number of trials published simultaneously in the NEJM: I honestly can’t quite wrap my head around what is happening. Congratulations to everyone involved. It was difficult to choose only five trials, but these are the ones I selected for the interventional https://t
2:14
30.4K views · 311 likes · 101 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
SWITCH-SWEDEHEART is a comparison between policies, not between drugs. The policy-recommended agent was dispensed to 75.8% of patients in the ticagrelor-policy group and 60.6% of those in the prasugrel-policy group. Why did patients in the prasugrel-policy group experience less 4.6K views · 55 likes · 16 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
EPIDAURUS was stopped for safety reasons: ticagrelor and prasugrel cause more bleeding than clopidogrel in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing PCI, and so far, there is nothing particularly surprising about that. But at this point, are we perhaps asking the wrong question? ht 6K views · 66 likes · 15 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@DFCapodanno Interesting take. LAAO is associated with a significant reduction in bleeding events and would be a favourable approach in HBR patients, especially those with CKD. The clinical meaningful absolute excess is low for ischemic stroke risk 0.5% (1/PY), using a Bayesian. 445 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@DFCapodanno Solid review. Implementation's the bottleneck though, not enough centres doing LAAC proficiently and the training pipeline is thin. Same old story. 717 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@DFCapodanno @gcfmd Seems counterintuitive that LAAO increased non procedural bleeding risk? 1.5K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
No free lunch. In our meta-analysis, now published in JAMA Cardiology, transcatheter left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was associated with similar long-term risks of any stroke and major bleeding compared with oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation, while ht 33.4K views · 250 likes · 78 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
The 10 trials I am most looking forward to at the ESC Hot Lines next week (in no particular order): LIBREXIA-ACS, where milvexian could end up like apixaban in APPRAISE-2, perhaps with less bleeding. Rivaroxaban did not exactly have an easy story after ATLAS ACS 2 either, https: 15.7K views · 197 likes · 62 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
@DFCapodanno Funny, yes - but also enjoyable as a paradox, since the figure is no longer unpublished!🙃 882 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@DFCapodanno 0.2 mm spatial resolution and 66 msec acquisition finally let us characterise plaque without motion artefact. This is the photon-counting threshold we've been waiting for. 807 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
For the “Let’s Normalize Editorial Tragedies” column, this one is pretty funny. https://t.co/A5yJlCcQEs https://t.co/QooRfFTsuk
14.6K views · 36 likes · 8 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

17 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views4 634this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %20.15%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.35%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post4 6349245.02×
Reach (views ÷ followers)20.15%3.62%5.57×
Engagement rate0.35%1.52%0.23×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

15.7K23 Aug
33.4K26 Aug
1.5K
717
44527 Aug
6K29 Aug
4.6K30 Aug
30.4K31 Aug
1K
1.3K
6171 Sep
22K5 Sep
15.4K6 Sep
29.8K20 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.71%23 Aug
1.02%26 Aug
0.13%
0.42%
0.22%27 Aug
1.42%29 Aug
1.62%30 Aug
1.38%31 Aug
0.29%
0.08%
0.00%1 Sep
1.11%5 Sep
1.39%6 Sep
0.35%20 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes55.7%1 325 in total
Reposts16.2%385 in total
Replies3.1%73 in total
Quotes1.3%32 in total
Bookmarks23.6%562 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts