tweetindex
EN

E. John Wherry

@EJohnWherry · joined 20 Jul 2013

Immunologist at University of Pennsylvania

15 392Followers
315Following
2 259Posts total
55.3KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

WTH is wrong with Russ Vought!?! Some personal vendetta against NIH and biomedical research? He is slowing scientific progress, massively undermining our global competitiveness, and because of him, we will have fewer new therapies for disease https://t.co/X9hngTev4q 8.5K views · 93 likes · 13 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
@EJohnWherry I just noticed you said not only "nature" but "the market". The papers claiming that ranged from wrong (Worobey) to deep into retraction-worthy territory (Pekar). https://t.co/ZaGttDq6au https://t.co/y5SprUQdxH 305 views · 21 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@EJohnWherry It's an un-peer reviewed theoretical study -- we have not seen a single natural SARS-like virus with an FCS. https://t.co/z722IkZ3VT
232 views · 20 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@EJohnWherry https://t.co/Ft8sujnOnZ 616 views · 26 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Yes - and directly rebuts one of the claims in Alina Chan's terrible NYT piece. I can't believe we are STILL arguing about this issue. The virus came from nature. Was some shady stuff happening in the lab? Yes. But the evidence overwhelmingly points to the market NOT the lab. 23.1K views · 120 likes · 28 reposts · 75 replies Open on X →
Your paper states: “The acquisition of an FCS in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 that is absent in its closest relatives that circulate in Rhinolophus bats has been the subject of much controversy. Lack of knowledge about the frequency and mechanism by which insertion mutations 12.7K views · 164 likes · 41 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →
Great article https://t.co/qWuh3CUEYA 5.1K views · 28 likes · 7 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Had a great time discussing chronic inflammation Brent Franson - on The Life Lab by Death Clock podcast. Chronic inflammation underlies many / most chronic diseases including cancer, chronic infections and autoimmunity. #ColtonConsortium https://t.co/ADxf2T88b4 3.1K views · 27 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/SFFG22iXpe 1.6K views · 7 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

9 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown to more people than peers of the same size.

Median views3 130this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %20.34%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %1.41%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post3 1309243.39×
Reach (views ÷ followers)20.34%3.62%5.62×
Engagement rate1.41%1.52%0.92×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.6K31 Jul
3.1K
5.1K10 Aug
12.7K18 Aug
23.1K19 Aug
616
232
305
8.5K20 Sep

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.49%31 Jul
1.02%
0.69%10 Aug
1.86%18 Aug
0.98%19 Aug
4.71%
9.91%
7.87%
1.41%20 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes62.9%506 in total
Reposts12.5%101 in total
Replies13.7%110 in total
Quotes2.0%16 in total
Bookmarks8.9%72 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts