JJ ✓

@JosephJacks_ · joined 06 Aug 2013

45 754Followers

507Following

68 083Posts total

463.1KViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

8 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. below its peers on both reach and engagement.

Median views594this account2 747median for 10K–100K

Reach, %1.30%this account8.35%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %0.77%this account1.45%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	594	2 747	0.22×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	1.30%	8.35%	0.16×
Engagement rate	0.77%	1.45%	0.53×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

408.1K24 Aug

50.2K19 Apr

29820 Apr

1088 Jun

5926 Jun

7423 Sep

1.3K

472

1.1K4 Sep

717

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.96%24 Aug

0.52%19 Apr

1.68%20 Apr

0.93%8 Jun

3.39%26 Jun

0.67%3 Sep

0.86%

0.21%

0.65%4 Sep

1.39%

0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.45%.

What the audience does

Likes74.3%3 231 in total

Reposts8.1%354 in total

Replies11.3%491 in total

Quotes2.9%125 in total

Bookmarks3.4%147 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

@JosephJacks_ what kind of work are you expecting these humanoids to do? 4 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 04 Sep 2026 I’m very excited to be sponsoring (@OSSCapital) and also speaking at the 32nd annual TSC (The Science of Consciousness) conference organized by my good friend and partner: the absolutely legendary and brilliant @StuartHameroff !! Tickets almost sold out I think… https://t.co/nWc 717 views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies 04 Sep 2026 🤣 1.1K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies 04 Sep 2026 . 472 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 03 Sep 2026 I just made this chart to explain something I’ve been thinking a lot about lately … the point at which humanoid robot production will exceed the birth rate. Not sure if anyone has pointed this out or treated it, so I apologize if so. What my essential view is … the quality of ht 1.3K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies 03 Sep 2026 The point at which humans are creating human-equivalent robots (in every uncanny way) at the same production rate as the birth rate … then, the human species will start being replaced. The numbers are shockingly low … only 300,000 ~ human babies are born everyday. Thats 130 ~ 742 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 03 Sep 2026 @JosephJacks_ @StuartHameroff I would like to hear your thoughts on my belief below? “True cosmic consciousness of living biological beings running on organic chemistry can’t be replicated by any machine no matter how sophisticated it may become! My personal belief! “ 59 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 26 Jun 2026 @JosephJacks_ @StuartHameroff JJ, the microtube detection results themselves are not problematic. The problem lies in Dr. Hameroff's reliance on Penrose's interpretation of the results regarding consciousness. Identifying consciousness as the generation of qubits is not problema 108 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies 08 Jun 2026 @JosephJacks_ @cdeadheadc @StuartHameroff Stuart Hameroff is my absolute hero. My respect for him knows no bounds. And, he introduced me to the work of Anirban Bandyopadhyay! 298 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies 20 Apr 2026 In the early 1970s, @StuartHameroff began writing about microtubules as molecular computers. By the mid-1980s, he was writing Ultimate Computing. When the book was published by Elsevier in 1987, it had cited no fewer than 14 scientists who would go on to win Nobel Prizes — in htt 50.2K views · 211 likes · 38 reposts · 8 replies 19 Apr 2026 @davidpattersonx Your estimates are about right. However, intelligent robots in humanoid form will far exceed the population of humans, as every person will want their own personal R2-D2 and C-3PO. And then there will be many robots in industry for every human to provide prod 408.1K views · 3K likes · 315 reposts · 478 replies 24 Aug 2025