BigShark🦈 ✓

@King_Shark02 · Leicester, England · joined 21 Feb 2026

Shark mode 🦈 | Curating across niches — legendary film scenes, raw tech takes, Movie Reviews | Action • Innovation • Sport • Reality

26 365Followers

3 434Following

12 975Posts total

51.5KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark027 Sep

One thing I think DC has over Marvel is the freedom to just tell a story without forcing everything to connect. DC can give us completely different versions of the same character, different worlds and different tones, and somehow it still works. Marvel mastered the connected ht 2.1K views · 152 likes · 142 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark026 Sep

@King_Shark02 Both could be true at once the nanotech suit may have just executed a threat response that Spider-Sense already triggered 94 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark026 Sep

@King_Shark02 I have always believed that scene revealed something profound about Spider-Man that many missed, which was Peter isn’t the only conscious entity in his body. I think what was reacting was his arachnid self, the other part of him that has been there the entire time. 126 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark026 Sep

@King_Shark02 Now that you mention it, the suit reacting on its own actually makes this scene way more interesting. Marvel may have left a clue right in front of us. 118 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark026 Sep

I think we may have misunderstood this scene in No Way Home. Doctor Strange separated Peter’s astral form from his body and tried to take the box, but Peter’s body kept reacting and moving it away. Everyone assumed it was Spider-Sense. But Peter was wearing a Stark nanotech ht 13.9K views · 149 likes · 137 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark026 Sep

The more I look at Tom Holland’s Spider-Man, the more I feel Marvel just gave us a finished product and told us not to ask questions. No spider bite scene. We don’t know what spider bit him, where it came from or what actually happened to his body. We just met Peter already htt 6.3K views · 182 likes · 165 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark025 Sep

@King_Shark02 Hulk didn’t walk it off. He just had the only body that could almost take it. Tony didn’t have that buffer, so the same power killed him. 665 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark025 Sep

@King_Shark02 Hulk didn’t “tank” the Stones like they were nothing. He just had the one body that could almost handle them. The Russo explanation is the simplest one: Banner’s gamma physiology is closer to the Stones’ energy than a regular human’s. That’s why they picked him for 711 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark025 Sep

@King_Shark02 The Stones didn't simply "kill whoever uses them." The Snap releases an enormous amount of energy, and the user's body has to survive channeling it. Hulk could survive the exposure; Tony couldn't. 563 views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark025 Sep

How did Hulk survive using all six Infinity Stones when the same snap killed Tony Stark? https://t.co/bgomVPJwRW 18.1K views · 274 likes · 174 reposts · 41 replies Open on X →

BigShark🦈 ✓@King_Shark024 Sep

The moment Tony Stark beat Loki mentally was right here. “If we can’t protect the Earth, you can be damn well sure we’ll avenge it.” Minutes later, Hulk reduced the “god” to two words: “Puny god.” https://t.co/kGHFiOsJ2C 8.8K views · 181 likes · 161 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

11 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. reaches fewer people than peers, but engages them much harder.

Median views711this account995median for 10K–100K

Reach, %2.70%this account3.85%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %1.95%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	711	995	0.71×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	2.70%	3.85%	0.70×
Engagement rate	1.95%	1.52%	1.28×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

8.8K4 Sep

18.1K5 Sep

563

711

665

6.3K6 Sep

13.9K

118

126

2.1K7 Sep

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

3.92%4 Sep

2.72%5 Sep

1.95%

0.28%

0.90%

5.82%6 Sep

2.12%

0.00%

14.59%7 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes42.0%957 in total

Reposts34.2%779 in total

Replies3.4%78 in total

Quotes0.4%9 in total

Bookmarks20.1%458 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

Against accounts of the same size

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Similar accounts