tweetindex
EN

Los Angeles Review of Books

@LAReviewofBooks · Los Angeles, CA · joined 18 Mar 2010

A multimedia literary and cultural arts magazine with an enduring commitment to the written word. Find us on Bluesky.

289 252Followers
3 468Following
117 776Posts total
23.8KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

"David Foster Wallace keeps us constantly anticipating action in the face of unrelenting letdowns. The key to how he manages this, I argue, lies in the grammatical structure of his 'unreadable' sentences." https://t.co/lIKLIT7mUF https://t.co/6RdLWjuE0u
4.6K views · 57 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
"An evil corporation censoring an ambitious novelist for ideological reasons? Nothing could be simpler or more soul-satisfying." From the archives: Exploring a depressing literary autopsy: https://t.co/ojH9GAq7Uw 1.8K views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
And…Scene. We’re excited to announce that LARB Quarterly, no. 50: Scene is officially coming soon, featuring essays, fiction, poems, and more from LARB contributors new and known. Take your place—join today to get your issue: https://t.co/yEeKH9dxcR https://t.co/fS5ypLk8Pm
1.1K views · 0 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
"It’s as if the author lacks the will to push her novel to an additional plane of unreality suitable to the West Coast weirdness she chronicles." J. W. Bonner on Grace Krilamovich's "Acid Green Velvet": https://t.co/gv7XXTCtNE https://t.co/VP6c5iyUuP
1.7K views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Unfortunately relevant again! As a reminder: Any official outreach from the LARB Radio Hour will always come from an lareviewofbooks dot org email address, and we do not charge a fee to appear. 5.8K views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
It's come to our attention that people have been portraying themselves as LARB editors and inviting writers to be on our podcast. Any official outreach or invitation for Radio Hour will always come from an lareviewofbooks . org email address, and we do not charge a fee to appear. 8.8K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

5 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 100K–1M follower range. below its peers on both reach and engagement.

Median views1 779this account4 799median for 100K–1M
Reach, %0.62%this account1.76%median for 100K–1M
Engagement, %0.28%this account1.30%median for 100K–1M
MetricThis accountMedian for 100K–1MRatio
Median views per post1 7794 7990.37×
Reach (views ÷ followers)0.62%1.76%0.35×
Engagement rate0.28%1.30%0.22×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

8.8K10 Apr
5.8K13 Aug
1.7K8 Sep
1.1K
1.8K
4.6K

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.02%10 Apr
0.19%13 Aug
0.41%8 Sep
0.09%
0.28%
1.35%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.30%.

What the audience does

Likes59.4%76 in total
Reposts4.7%6 in total
Replies1.6%2 in total
Quotes3.1%4 in total
Bookmarks31.2%40 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts