Marik vR

@MvonRen · joined 31 Aug 2019

Fmr federal gov’t (DoD, et al.) Occasional opinion @TheHill

22 538Followers

1 741Following

11 819Posts total

1.6MViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

7 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown far beyond its own audience, and the audience reacts.

Median views9 590this account3 259median for 10K–100K

Reach, %42.55%this account10.24%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %1.98%this account1.40%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	9 590	3 259	2.94×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	42.55%	10.24%	4.16×
Engagement rate	1.98%	1.40%	1.41×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

754.9K15 Jun

242.7K13 Apr

13K13 Jul

583.9K19 Aug

14.7K25 Aug

6.5K26 Aug

7.3K27 Aug

3.5K1 Sep

9.6K2 Sep

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.28%15 Jun

0.40%13 Apr

0.57%13 Jul

1.03%19 Aug

1.97%25 Aug

2.93%26 Aug

1.91%27 Aug

4.06%1 Sep

2.49%2 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.40%.

What the audience does

Likes73.4%7 715 in total

Reposts14.4%1 513 in total

Replies6.2%651 in total

Quotes2.8%292 in total

Bookmarks3.3%346 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

IT ONLY TAKES *ONE* UFO CASE As I stated publicly, I challenge *anyone* to review (1) the verifiable 3D geometric data and (2) the clear falsification of the only viable prosaic theories for the “Gimbal” video. There is no doubt that “Gimbal” is anomalous. H/t @disclosurefound 9.6K views · 186 likes · 36 reposts · 12 replies 02 Sep 2026 Drones are a massive national security risk. But the White Sands “orb” UAP are *not* drones. At least one “super-hot” UAP was perfectly round, matching other UFOs captured on military sensors and described by pilots/Trump/AARO officials recently. It looks nothing like a drone. 3.5K views · 119 likes · 17 reposts · 4 replies 01 Sep 2026 WHAT ARE THE ‘SUPER-HOT’ WHITE SANDS ‘ORBS’? They are *not*: -Balloons -Flares (see post below) -Exhaust from a distant jet (the @MickWest special) One “orb” is also *sharply defined* and *perfectly round* (especially compared to UFO debunkers’ favorite videos - see below). 7.3K views · 113 likes · 16 reposts · 8 replies 27 Aug 2026 UFOs & NUKES: The two most significant UFO waves in U.S. history coincided with critical moments in nuclear weapons development. Mid-1947: U.S. begins mass production of atomic weapons 1952: DC incidents occurred three months before the first thermonuclear weapon was deton 6.5K views · 146 likes · 31 reposts · 10 replies 26 Aug 2026 Why Did UFOs Appear in 1947? Early/mid-1947 is precisely when hope of international control of nuclear energy (Baruch Plan) fades and mass production of atomic weapons begins. UAP appear; cluster around Hanford. (April 1947: Truman stunned that the US had *no* assembled nukes) 14.7K views · 214 likes · 50 reposts · 19 replies 25 Aug 2026 Our own agencies went back through every past sighting, asked what draws these things in, then recreated those conditions on purpose at a site with prior activity. ODNI, CIA, FBI and military intelligence were all on site. Something showed up. 583.9K views · 4.7K likes · 780 reposts · 411 replies 19 Aug 2026 Skeptic @MickWest claims the objects were “probably flares.” But stitching together the ground-based imagery shows that at least one UAP - which is much hotter than its nighttime surroundings - climbs consistently. That rules out a flare. So, what was that “super hot” object? 13K views · 63 likes · 7 reposts · 3 replies 13 Jul 2026 IMPORTANT: New discoveries in the ‘Gimbal’ UAP Video *DEFINITIVELY* Falsify the ‘Glare’ and ‘Distant Jet’ Theories The object conducted extraordinary maneuvers despite lacking wings or apparent means of propulsion. Video: https://t.co/2AeL9UQ8Jw @DoW_AARO H/t: @ZaineMichael1 242.7K views · 748 likes · 177 reposts · 42 replies 13 Apr 2026 Scientific analysis of the “Gimbal” UAP: Video: https://t.co/DVp8xvV2TX Paper: https://t.co/fNce3AhJym 3D reconstructions corroborate aircrew accounts of highly anomalous flight characteristics (advanced maneuvers with no discernible wings or propulsion). Not a “distant” jet. 754.9K views · 1.5K likes · 399 reposts · 142 replies 15 Jun 2023