tweetindex
EN

Marik vR

@MvonRen · joined 31 Aug 2019

Fmr federal gov’t (DoD, et al.) Occasional opinion @TheHill

22 542Followers
1 741Following
11 826Posts total
1.1MViews on collected posts

Latest posts

IT ONLY TAKES *ONE* UFO CASE As I stated publicly, I challenge *anyone* to review (1) the verifiable 3D geometric data and (2) the clear falsification of the only viable prosaic theories for the “Gimbal” video. There is no doubt that “Gimbal” is anomalous. H/t @disclosurefound 9.6K views · 186 likes · 36 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
Drones are a massive national security risk. But the White Sands “orb” UAP are *not* drones. At least one “super-hot” UAP was perfectly round, matching other UFOs captured on military sensors and described by pilots/Trump/AARO officials recently. It looks nothing like a drone. 3.5K views · 119 likes · 17 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
WHAT ARE THE ‘SUPER-HOT’ WHITE SANDS ‘ORBS’? They are *not*: -Balloons -Flares (see post below) -Exhaust from a distant jet (the @MickWest special) One “orb” is also *sharply defined* and *perfectly round* (especially compared to UFO debunkers’ favorite videos - see below). 7.3K views · 113 likes · 16 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
UFOs & NUKES: The two most significant UFO waves in U.S. history coincided with critical moments in nuclear weapons development. Mid-1947: U.S. begins mass production of atomic weapons 1952: DC incidents occurred three months before the first thermonuclear weapon was detonated 6.5K views · 146 likes · 31 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
Why Did UFOs Appear in 1947? Early/mid-1947 is precisely when hope of international control of nuclear energy (Baruch Plan) fades and mass production of atomic weapons begins. UAP appear; cluster around Hanford. (April 1947: Truman stunned that the US had *no* assembled nukes) 14.7K views · 214 likes · 50 reposts · 19 replies Open on X →
Skeptic @MickWest claims the objects were “probably flares.” But stitching together the ground-based imagery shows that at least one UAP - which is much hotter than its nighttime surroundings - climbs consistently. That rules out a flare. So, what was that “super hot” object? 13K views · 63 likes · 7 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@MvonRen @DoW_AARO @ZaineMichael1 No offense Marik, but common sense and factual reasoning are concepts that Mick West and other debunkers are unable or unwilling to grasp. The rest of us understand the Gimbal video for what it is, a NHI craft, but kudos for trying to educate Mic 923 views · 14 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@MvonRen @DoW_AARO @ZaineMichael1 https://t.co/2M9SSqYfnE 867 views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@MvonRen @DoW_AARO @ZaineMichael1 And: “What you don’t see [on the declassified footage] is the radar information, which shows a formation of four to six objects that were operating kind of outward of the gimbal." -Ryan Graves https://t.co/7MkxsX77CY 1.2K views · 19 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
IMPORTANT: New discoveries in the ‘Gimbal’ UAP Video *DEFINITIVELY* Falsify the ‘Glare’ and ‘Distant Jet’ Theories The object conducted extraordinary maneuvers despite lacking wings or apparent means of propulsion. Video: https://t.co/2AeL9UQ8Jw @DoW_AARO H/t: @ZaineMichael1 243.7K views · 749 likes · 177 reposts · 42 replies Open on X →
@KaceyMusgraves McFraud West, @MickWest, @flarkey & his mates... When will they learn...😆😆😆 https://t.co/SfNx2HVU3M 3.9K views · 33 likes · 0 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
@MvonRen Your paper passes the GPT test lol. https://t.co/bHCKgUVwgt 2.9K views · 22 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Marik vR@MvonRen
@MvonRen Marik, congratulations, checkmate. I'm not surprised, considering that NASA said, about @MickWest , "No, I don't think he will add value... you can consider the audience a team of Mick Wests w/ACTUAL experience"⬇️. #ufotwitter #uaptwitter #uaps #ufos https://t.co/kuVekZG 9.9K views · 67 likes · 11 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
Marik vR@MvonRen
@MvonRen Greenstreet right now https://t.co/rgk9MzTckm 2.1K views · 20 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Marik vR@MvonRen
Scientific analysis of the “Gimbal” UAP: Video: https://t.co/DVp8xvV2TX Paper: https://t.co/fNce3AhJym 3D reconstructions corroborate aircrew accounts of highly anomalous flight characteristics (advanced maneuvers with no discernible wings or propulsion). Not a “distant” jet. 755K views · 1.5K likes · 399 reposts · 142 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

5 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown far beyond its own audience, and the audience reacts.

Median views7 266this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %32.23%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %2.49%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post7 2669247.86×
Reach (views ÷ followers)32.23%3.62%8.90×
Engagement rate2.49%1.52%1.64×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.1K15 Jun
9.9K
2.9K7 Dec
3.9K11 Apr
243.7K13 Apr
1.2K
867
92314 Apr
13K13 Jul
14.7K25 Aug
6.5K26 Aug
7.3K27 Aug
3.5K1 Sep
9.6K2 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.04%15 Jun
0.92%
0.86%7 Dec
1.01%11 Apr
0.40%13 Apr
1.83%
1.61%
2.06%14 Apr
0.57%13 Jul
1.97%25 Aug
2.93%26 Aug
1.91%27 Aug
4.06%1 Sep
2.49%2 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes66.7%3 246 in total
Reposts15.4%749 in total
Replies5.5%267 in total
Quotes2.4%115 in total
Bookmarks10.0%487 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts