tweetindex
EN

Peter Bukowski

@Peter_Bukowski · joined 19 Apr 2009

Co-Founder of The Leap • Host of @LockedOnPackers and Locked on Sports Today • Dad joke aficionado • #Cuse • Largest aggressor Contact: hello@thegoldarena.com

57 538Followers
1 300Following
278 084Posts total
588.6KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

.@nateburleson just said the Vikings blitzed at the highest rate in 10 years. 84% That’s insane, even by Flores standards 747 views · 21 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Brian Flores in the first half https://t.co/xmNv0yEIpv
GIF
1.2K views · 25 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Tucker Kraft would have moonwalked in too. Running the ball right before sets this up too. Minnesota credibly thought they could again with two timeouts left. https://t.co/jru58S4ZS3
0:10
3.4K views · 79 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@Peter_Bukowski Literally every dropped INT has resulted in the team getting a TD. Every single one. Don't question it. It's true. 150 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@Peter_Bukowski Lmao https://t.co/9k7eiVunkG
553 views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Dropped interceptions kill you every damn time. 4.6K views · 71 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@Peter_Bukowski A great HC wouldn't be struggling with this 7 years in 209 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@Peter_Bukowski Thats the MLF philosophy, even when Aaron won his b2b MVPs he wasnt top 10 in attempts per game. We saw the same with Malik Willis. Question is if the philosophy relies on low volume to be successful, is that why it fizzles out in big games?? 712 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@Peter_Bukowski Amen! Jacobs probably has 1 more year with us. Love proved he what he can do given the volume… let him work and you probably get a lot more out of Jacobs too 682 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Jordan Love was one of the most efficient quarterbacks in the NFL in 2025 but didn't have the volume of other top QBs. Whoever is calling plays in 2026 has to find out if Love can shoulder a bigger burden and remain efficient. https://t.co/jdkKZzWcD5 576.4K views · 167 likes · 15 reposts · 31 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. reaches fewer people than peers, but engages them much harder.

Median views996this account922median for 10K–100K
Reach, %1.73%this account3.42%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %2.22%this account1.53%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post9969221.08×
Reach (views ÷ followers)1.73%3.42%0.51×
Engagement rate2.22%1.53%1.45×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

576.4K14 Jan
682
712
2097 May
4.6K13 Sep
553
150
3.4K
1.2K
747

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.04%14 Jan
0.29%
0.56%
0.96%7 May
1.60%13 Sep
2.35%
0.00%
2.48%
2.09%
3.35%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.53%.

What the audience does

Likes82.7%382 in total
Reposts4.3%20 in total
Replies8.4%39 in total
Bookmarks4.5%21 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts