tweetindex
EN

QJE

@QJEHarvard · joined 01 Jan 2018

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is the oldest professional journal of Economics in the English language. Edited by the Department of Economics at Harvard.

58 902Followers
2Following
889Posts total
279.5KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

@QJEHarvard @microsamonomics @annastansbury @ALPWillen Agreed 54 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@QJEHarvard The policy question is the distribution of effects, not the average alone. A guaranteed income can reduce measured employment while improving bargaining power, job matching, caregiving, or risk tolerance. The scoreboard needs more than hours worked. 6 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@QJEHarvard Here's the summary. Consistent with prior trials of UBI solutions. Basically humans need to set their own goals and work through them. 😱 QJEHarvard announces acceptance of a paper by Vivalt et al. examining causal effects of $1,000 monthly unconditional cash transfer 353 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@QJEHarvard Was the net -$900 a result of losing other benefits or just working less 1.4K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@QJEHarvard @bocowgill @evanpstarr Ha! Very clever title! 79 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@QJEHarvard @bocowgill @evanpstarr Congrats again Bo et al., what a truly impressive and creative field experiment. 3.1K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Recently accepted by #QJE: “The Employment Effects of a Guaranteed Income: Experimental Evidence from Two U.S. States,” by Vivalt, Rhodes, Bartik, Broockman, Krause, and Miller: https://t.co/ajM7dJzVY4 130.8K views · 164 likes · 32 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Recently accepted by #QJE: “Mental Models of the Stock Market,” by Andre, Schirmer (@ph_schirmer), and Wohlfart: https://t.co/6WAmGcdctK 7K views · 45 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Recently accepted by #QJE: “Clause and Effect: Theory and Field Experimental Evidence on Noncompete Clauses,” by Cowgill (@bocowgill), Freiberg, and Starr (@evanpstarr): https://t.co/1i4mZAx3bT 62.7K views · 182 likes · 40 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Recently accepted by #QJE: “Capital Services in Global Value Chains,” by Xiang Ding (@xiangxding): https://t.co/zW2IZf3IKp 13.9K views · 70 likes · 16 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Recently accepted by #QJE: “The Transmission of Reliable and Unreliable Information,” by Graeber, Noy, and Roth: https://t.co/x29lywedKW 9.5K views · 95 likes · 14 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@QJEHarvard @microsamonomics @annastansbury @ALPWillen This was an exceptional paper. https://t.co/YYnQ5Ovzsw 6.5K views · 26 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@QJEHarvard @microsamonomics @annastansbury @ALPWillen Congrats @microsamonomics 759 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
When unionization increased in Norway after 2002, a naive regression would tell you that productivity *increased*. Wages rose, employment rose, and output expanded. But that isn't the whole story! The productivity gain is just an illusion. 1/ https://t.co/gszCWj68qM 43.5K views · 309 likes · 38 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

11 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views3 098this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %5.26%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.37%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post3 0989243.35×
Reach (views ÷ followers)5.26%3.62%1.45×
Engagement rate0.37%1.52%0.24×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

43.5K20 May
75912 Jul
6.5K13 Jul
9.5K14 Aug
13.9K
62.7K
7K
130.8K
3.1K
7916 Aug
1.4K
35317 Aug
630 Aug
541 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.81%20 May
0.53%12 Jul
0.43%13 Jul
1.14%14 Aug
0.63%
0.37%
0.75%
0.17%
0.29%
1.27%16 Aug
0.15%
0.57%17 Aug
0.00%30 Aug
0.00%1 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes63.2%906 in total
Reposts10.1%145 in total
Replies1.0%14 in total
Quotes2.0%29 in total
Bookmarks23.7%339 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts