tweetindex
EN

ResearchHub ✓

@ResearchHub · Earth 🌍🌎🌏 · joined 22 Jan 2019

The fastest way to fund science. $1.8M+ funded, powered by $RSC. Post an RFP. Discover high quality preregistered proposals. Paid peer review in 10 days.

43 338Followers
1Following
2 673Posts total
135.4KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

Eggs and dementia, the Finnish cohort in the new review: HR 0.74 in the top intake quartile, CI 0.53 to 1.02. Adjusting for cholesterol intake moves it to 0.78, CI 0.51 to 1.19. Eleven studies, not one a controlled trial. https://t.co/JUwG8rytvV 1.3K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
A new way to split cis from trans regulation reassigns the yeast data hard: 17,112 gene-cross differences land on cis, against 2,804 in the original analysis. Trans barely moved, 57,253 to 51,627 (285,777 pairs). https://t.co/WE9vEqVDPf 1.2K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
The EEG study behind this: 40 students wrote words in cursive or typed with one finger, 36 analysed. No memory test. A 142-student direct replication of the learning claim found no longhand advantage (g -0.08, -0.13). https://t.co/hSWApU3Sk4 1.3K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Retatrutide at 12 mg took 24.2% of body weight off in 48 weeks, against 2.1% on placebo (phase 2, randomized, n=338). The weight curve had not flattened when dosing stopped. Nausea ran 45% at that dose. https://t.co/Cf75qK0Wsj 1.2K views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Moderate egg consumption is associated with improved cognitive function. https://t.co/EgKyiN71Ui
103.4K views · 3.1K likes · 288 reposts · 49 replies Open on X →
Beautiful paper on how to tease apart cis vs. trans contributions to differences in gene expression. Work of Ingileif Hallgrímsdóttir and Maria Carilli just out in Genetics https://t.co/onL106p57D 1/🧵 https://t.co/s3Z9xWb1dP
13.9K views · 186 likes · 31 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
Since January 2025, ResearchHub has deployed over $1.5M in research funding to scientists worldwide. We just redesigned our funding page to make it even easier for funders and researchers to connect. Take a look ↓ https://t.co/BLp1KaeS5s https://t.co/vJYW57oZi5
0:33
13K views · 89 likes · 15 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. ordinary reach for its size, weaker reaction than most.

Median views1 318this account1 021median for 10K–100K
Reach, %3.04%this account4.01%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.62%this account1.55%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post1 3181 0211.29×
Reach (views ÷ followers)3.04%4.01%0.76×
Engagement rate0.62%1.55%0.40×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

13K6 May
13.9K15 Sep
103.4K22 Sep
1.2K
1.3K23 Sep
1.2K
1.3K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.84%6 May
1.61%15 Sep
3.34%22 Sep
0.64%
0.52%23 Sep
0.59%
0.54%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.55%.

What the audience does

Likes72.3%3 350 in total
Reposts7.2%334 in total
Replies1.3%62 in total
Quotes1.4%64 in total
Bookmarks17.8%825 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts