tweetindex
EN

@theroyaleditor

@RobertDJobson · London, England · joined 20 Feb 2011

#1 bestselling author & award-winning Journalist. Royal Contributor @ABC @GMA Royal Editor @Sunriseon7 📖The Windsor Legacy. https://t.co/6W4VndbLS5 Substack👇

47 252Followers
4 610Following
88 044Posts total
7.7KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

https://t.co/34hvoKjMpp
513 views · 5 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/Fi41He3x5j 893 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/IBUrMbSDGc 969 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@RobertDJobson https://t.co/gdmDzbJGo6 23 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Interesting - King Charles aside all those he makes shocking claims about are dead and cannot answer. Did Spencer think at the time of writing King Charles would soon be gone also, bearing in mind earlier on the king’s cancer was more concerning. @RobertDJobson 285 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@RobertDJobson Good article Rob,and very fair too. The Windsor temper can be 'volcanic', especially with Charles at that time, and - as you say - funerals are intense affairs even more so when there's been a history of tension and breakups. 131 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@RobertDJobson What ever in love means … yeah that was kind. 78 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@RobertDJobson I had trouble believing that (alleged) quote from the King. 117 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
I KNOW Charles was devastated when Diana died – he’s kind not cruel & wouldn’t be so flippant about mother of his kids https://t.co/cJZzXWS36o 3.2K views · 217 likes · 20 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Palace fury as insiders blast Spencer’s ‘motive’ for bombshell memoir & slam: ‘King was in deep grief’ after Diana death https://t.co/O3PagfdaMk 1.5K views · 62 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

10 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. reaches fewer people than peers of the same size.

Median views399this account1 015median for 10K–100K
Reach, %0.84%this account3.95%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %1.64%this account1.54%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post3991 0150.39×
Reach (views ÷ followers)0.84%3.95%0.21×
Engagement rate1.64%1.54%1.07×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.5K17 Sep
3.2K
117
78
13118 Sep
285
23
96919 Sep
893
513

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

4.66%17 Sep
7.63%
5.13%
2.56%
1.53%18 Sep
1.75%
0.00%
0.31%19 Sep
0.11%
1.36%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.54%.

What the audience does

Likes87.2%300 in total
Reposts8.1%28 in total
Replies1.5%5 in total
Quotes1.2%4 in total
Bookmarks2.0%7 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts