SPUR

@SPUR_Urbanist · San Francisco+San José+Oakland · joined 07 May 2009

💡 IDEAS + ACTION FOR A BETTER CITY 🙏 a member-supported nonprofit organization 🔗 https://t.co/6SEU9rEXea Working toward a Bay Area region where all people thrive.

25 314Followers

2 514Following

29 277Posts total

2KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

SPUR@SPUR_Urbanist3 Sep

📢 Join us Sept 10 in SF: how Zero NOx rules for gas water heaters & furnaces could clean up Bay Area air. Panelists: Dr. Lisa Patel, Zoe Elizabeth, Nik Kaestner, Eric Morrill, Kristina Pappas Moderator: Laura Klivans Register 👉 https://t.co/p8qPDhuqey 287 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

SPUR@SPUR_Urbanist1 Sep

September is Transit Month — and it's bigger and better than ever. Check out dozens of events happening around the Bay Area this month! https://t.co/5cmshR7PJX #TransitMonth #RegionalTransitMeasure #StrongerMuniforAll https://t.co/ZRkwJN85cs

395 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

SPUR@SPUR_Urbanist25 Aug

Two bills that would slash the cost of heat pumps, solar & home hardening are on Gov. Newsom’s desk. SB 222 & AB 1738 fix broken permitting & inspection rules that add hundreds of dollars to routine clean energy & home retrofit projects. We urge @CAGovernor to sign them. #CAleg 532 views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

SPUR@SPUR_Urbanist19 Aug

Can Bay Area transit agencies avert a fiscal cliff by reallocating capital funds to cover operational needs? SPUR explains why that strategy isn’t a fix. Two tax measures on the November ballot offer a more complete and timely solution. https://t.co/2QOmXundyc 383 views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

SPUR@SPUR_Urbanist17 Aug

Wildfire risks and rising insurance rates highlight the need for community-scale home hardening. CA is considering financing proposals to make retrofits more affordable. SPUR identifies the bills' pros and cons and their standing in the legislature. https://t.co/bgpIifqghZ 412 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

5 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. below its peers on both reach and engagement.

Median views395this account924median for 10K–100K

Reach, %1.56%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %0.94%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	395	924	0.43×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	1.56%	3.62%	0.43×
Engagement rate	0.94%	1.52%	0.62×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

41217 Aug

38319 Aug

53225 Aug

3951 Sep

2873 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.46%17 Aug

1.31%19 Aug

0.94%25 Aug

0.51%1 Sep

0.70%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes80.0%16 in total

Reposts15.0%3 in total

Replies5.0%1 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.