Slade Bond ✓

@SladeBond

Chair, Policy @CGL_Law • Former Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs @TheJusticeDept • Chief Antitrust Counsel @HouseJudiciary

2 095Followers

2 214Following

1 320Posts total

23.4KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

Slade Bond ✓@SladeBond17 Sep

@SladeBond Totally agree with this 15 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Slade Bond ✓@SladeBond16 Sep

As @BedoyaUSA, @mattplatkin, @linamkhan, and many others have noted, laws on the books for more than a century already have quite a lot to say about many of the serious risks posed by AI. Others could be updated with modest amendments to keep pace with innovation, and we have 586 views · 15 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Slade Bond ✓@SladeBond16 Sep

2. The Hill has been flooded with pro-industry outreach, perhaps more than ever before. Members and staff have been bombarded with meeting requests, made easier by AI-generated emails and access to staff contacts. Much of that outreach comes from companies advocating for 495 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Slade Bond ✓@SladeBond16 Sep

3. Finally, @FrankPallone makes an important point: Why should AI externalities be treated differently than other risks we routinely regulate? https://t.co/RI6klkzZzx Members of Congress do not need to be doctors or patients taking a particular drug to understand why we have an 1.2K views · 14 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Slade Bond ✓@SladeBond16 Sep

I appreciate reporters asking Members of Congress whether they use AI. It’s an important question, and people should understand how Congress thinks about these technologies and their risks. But as someone who investigated technology firms and complex business practices in 20.5K views · 56 likes · 14 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Slade Bond ✓@SladeBond16 Sep

1. Members and staff have invested significant time studying AI policy, along with consumer protection, copyright, product safety, and competition issues. Many of the Hill staff closest to this work are experienced lawyers and technologists who can call leading experts, 717 views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the under 10K follower range. reaches fewer people than peers of the same size.

Median views652this account3 636median for under 10K

Reach, %31.10%this account227.51%median for under 10K

Engagement, %1.48%this account1.38%median for under 10K

Metric	This account	Median for under 10K	Ratio
Median views per post	652	3 636	0.18×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	31.10%	2.3× audience	0.14×
Engagement rate	1.48%	1.38%	1.07×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

71716 Sep

20.5K

1.2K

495

586

1517 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.39%16 Sep

0.38%

1.56%

1.62%

3.24%

0.00%17 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.38%.

What the audience does

Likes68.2%101 in total

Reposts14.2%21 in total

Replies4.1%6 in total

Quotes3.4%5 in total

Bookmarks10.1%15 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

Against accounts of the same size

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Similar accounts