tweetindex
EN

Stroke AHA/ASA

@StrokeAHA_ASA · joined 06 Dec 2011

Stroke publishes peer-reviewed research on cerebral circulation and its diseases. Tweets/RT are not medical advice. RT/follows do not imply endorsement.

38 501Followers
1 660Following
25 398Posts total
4.4KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

#STROKE: Longitudinal #CARDIA study identified higher systolic blood pressure and smoking before age 40 as key predictors of midlife cognitive decline, accompanied by white matter, gray matter, and brain network changes. https://t.co/a2ATDUBhmR https://t.co/JkfZGR2gx7
Graphic abstract in Yaghoobi et al.
271 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
#STROKE: This topical review by @wechsler_paul et al. provides an overview of key methodology in the UW-mRS analysis to aid in its interpretation with suggestions on future studies. https://t.co/mGCrWRBqGc https://t.co/xIwXlALxQj
Graphic abstract in Wechsler et al.
592 views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Article Commentary: “Value of 24- to 48-Hour Infarct Volume as a Surrogate for Clinical Outcome in Late-Window Thrombectomy May Be Limited” In this #BloggingStroke post, @karishma_popli discusses #Stroke article by @johanna_ospel et al. https://t.co/qiw5rbTiGk 879 views · 9 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@ashupjadhav @JeremyHeitMDPHD @mayank_G0 @mihill68 @TudorGJovin @RaulNogueiraMD @sheilambrasil @dliebesk @DCNSNeuro @UCalgaryMed @CooperHospital 218 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
In an analysis drawing on participants from the CARDIA study, social determinants of health spanning several domains were associated with #stroke risk. @dmljmd @Cdintica https://t.co/I3OynWRLyb https://t.co/fZ5XgUVRcx
Graphic abstract in Fleming et al.
767 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@StrokeAHA_ASA @philip_bath The interaction by infarct pattern is intriguing—was it prespecified, and how robust was it after adjusting for infarct volume and stroke severity? I’m digging into it with Sci-Quest, a platform for biomedical literature reviews: https://t.co/AMUYFvZ8P 11 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
In the #TAPIS trial, #stroke patients with multiple acute infarcts had poorer outcomes but showed a signal toward greater benefit from early ticagrelor–aspirin after IVT, without excess sICH. @philip_bath https://t.co/gqaEcvX46g https://t.co/IBvHfLr6sM
Graphic abstract in Zi and He et al.
1.7K views · 31 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

7 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. below its peers on both reach and engagement.

Median views592this account997median for 10K–100K
Reach, %1.54%this account3.69%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.65%this account1.61%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post5929970.59×
Reach (views ÷ followers)1.54%3.69%0.42×
Engagement rate0.65%1.61%0.40×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.7K15 Sep
11
76716 Sep
218
879
592
271

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.13%15 Sep
0.00%
0.65%16 Sep
0.00%
1.71%
1.01%
0.37%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.61%.

What the audience does

Likes62.0%49 in total
Reposts12.7%10 in total
Replies5.1%4 in total
Bookmarks20.3%16 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts