devalopr ✓

@_devalopr

Full Stack Robotics Engineer | 24 | Founder @AIRO3D | 12X hackathon 🏆

2 823Followers

562Following

4 034Posts total

32.1MViews on collected posts

Against accounts of the same size

4 posts from the last 90 days, next to the under 10K follower range. shown to more people than peers of the same size.

Median views3 862 984this account2 072median for under 10K

Reach, %136839.67%this account153.47%median for under 10K

Engagement, %1.39%this account1.63%median for under 10K

Metric	This account	Median for under 10K	Ratio
Median views per post	3 862 984	2 072	1 864×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	1368.4× audience	153.47%	892×
Engagement rate	1.39%	1.63%	0.85×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

24.3M27 Jul

7.6M28 Jul

74.3K

90.6K

Last 4 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.47%27 Jul

0.92%28 Jul

2.15%

1.86%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.63%.

What the audience does

Likes69.7%134 929 in total

Reposts20.0%38 677 in total

Replies2.7%5 226 in total

Quotes4.4%8 454 in total

Bookmarks3.3%6 349 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

I don't think most people care about destroying common books to comply with copyright laws The problem here is the loss of information when you destroy rare books. This machine can scan almost 2000 pages per hour. I've seen a faster non destructive one but I doubt if it can 90.6K views · 1.6K likes · 62 reposts · 33 replies 28 Jul 2026 · Open on X →

@_devalopr the problem isn't capability to not destroy the books, the issue is that destroying the books is necessary for copyright compliance. They wouldn't do it if they had any way around it. Copyright laws need to change. 74.3K views · 1.5K likes · 33 reposts · 42 replies 28 Jul 2026 · Open on X →

It's completely unnecessary to destroy books when machines like this exist. This book scanner by Treventus for example, can scan fragile books without destroying it. https://t.co/s70X2JYut4 7.6M views · 58.9K likes · 10K reposts · 1K replies 28 Jul 2026 · Open on X →

🦔AI companies are bulk-buying rare books, scanning them through high-speed machines that cut the spines off, and shredding the originals. A service called ISBNdb facilitates orders of up to a million books and keeps buyers anonymous. Pre-2022 books are premium because they're htt 24.3M views · 72.9K likes · 28.6K reposts · 4.1K replies 27 Jul 2026 · Open on X →