tweetindex
EN

Alex Stamos ✓

@alexstamos · San Francisco, CA · joined 21 May 2009

Doing AI security stuff at https://t.co/dAzjWy3P9q and teaching at Stanford (https://t.co/qi1lzlkg3K).

91 152Followers
1 927Following
214Posts total
793.6KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

If you know nothing about AI or cyber, both Dwarkesh and Chamath's takes are comforting shadows on the cave wall. The former interprets AI as having human-like motivations, the latter frames this entire incident as a psyop by people as cynical and unethical as him. More soon. 16.3K views · 131 likes · 9 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
For anyone who avoided reading that Dwarkesh piece, too bad because I need you to at least experience this pain with me. https://t.co/Xxx18fCn8J 66.7K views · 573 likes · 43 reposts · 63 replies Open on X →
Proud to have @corridor's logo on this. AI is already massively uplifting attacker capabilities. I have compared it to every threat actor being promoted to the Premier League; there are no longer second tier groups lacking ability to do 0-day discovery and exploit development. 6.2K views · 27 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Hey, @TsentaAi, are you bouncing your spammy AI job applications off of residential proxies? Do these people (and ISPs) know you are ruining their IP reputation and making it impossible for the people actually in that home to find a job? Does @ycombinator know about this? https:/ 10.9K views · 91 likes · 6 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
Thank you to @DKThomp for the chance to talk about this summer's cybersecurity and AI craziness and what it means for the future on the Plain English Podcast. It's a challenge communicating these issues to the broader public but Derek is a pro. https://t.co/3dCcDDOS1Z 21.5K views · 31 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I would love to see a tiger team drawn from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google (who apparently knows how to jail models) AISI, and independent experts take a look at all these escapes and quickly publish industry guidelines on isolation/airgaps/data diodes. https://t.co/z9nTn3tnab 7.9K views · 81 likes · 19 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
The only upside I can see from this whole mess is that there is a whole bunch of VCs with former or current Administration affiliation who we can now safely ignore on AI policy. They have shown that everything they ever said on AI regulation was just politically motivated. 15.6K views · 150 likes · 9 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
For all the “This is what Anthropic wanted” people/bots. No, they didn’t. They didn’t want a stupid, knee-jerk response on a Friday. We give the USG huge powers, this is why you staff it with competent, calm, non-corrupt people who don’t use those powers to punish enemies. 19.4K views · 186 likes · 5 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@alexstamos I’d peg Amazon as the guilty party here. When the CEO of a big trusted tech company tells gov “this is bad,” of course they will freak out. Amazon should have known better and possibly had ulterior motives. 29.3K views · 104 likes · 0 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
This was a huge own goal for the US, and we will see how bad US models get over the next six months and if Chinese models become noticeably better for cyber work. 59.8K views · 422 likes · 10 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
In short, Anthropic's blog is saying: We have always cared about safety, we did a good job initially, the actual AI experts in USG agreed, we proved it, we will come up with standards so these things are better communicated, welcome to the AI safety club Trump admin. 56.9K views · 407 likes · 13 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
4) There is no good scoring framework for jailbreaks; this would be an improvement. The inclusion of Amazon as the first name in the coalition is not an accident. Anthropic is saying "Amazon's inability to appropriately communicate severity threw our industry into chaos". https:/ 75.2K views · 393 likes · 8 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
5) "You don't have to get Dario on the phone to talk to us about these things. Other people work here, we swear." https://t.co/ZRMJxurNLJ 57.4K views · 328 likes · 8 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
"No big deal, just join the trusted group!" the apologists will say, but the restrictions mean you can't build a product on those models. Security companies and startups that provide services to others will now be driven to use Chinese models. Big win for PRC labs this month. 146.4K views · 609 likes · 29 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
3) CAISI is the group that is supposed to actually make these determinations, not the political actors in the White House. They were positive on the prior safeguards. The implication is that this whole thing was unnecessary. https://t.co/AnRIm8ohws 86.4K views · 363 likes · 12 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
2) Anthropic makes the cost of this White House freakout clear. US labs now have to make a much more conservative precision-recall tradeoff on cyber refusals. US models will become much less useful for defensive cybersecurity work unless you are in the trusted group. https://t.co 117.5K views · 531 likes · 29 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views13 610this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %14.93%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.93%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post13 61092414.7×
Reach (views ÷ followers)14.93%3.62%4.12×
Engagement rate0.93%1.52%0.61×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

146.4K1 Jul
57.4K
75.2K
56.9K
59.8K
29.3K
19.4K
15.6K
7.9K7 Aug
21.5K18 Aug
10.9K
6.2K27 Aug
66.7K30 Aug
16.3K31 Aug

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.44%1 Jul
0.59%
0.54%
0.74%
0.74%
0.38%
1.01%
1.03%
1.34%7 Aug
0.17%18 Aug
0.94%
0.50%27 Aug
1.03%30 Aug
0.91%31 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes85.5%4 427 in total
Reposts4.0%206 in total
Replies2.2%113 in total
Quotes0.7%35 in total
Bookmarks7.7%398 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts