Professor Peter Arenella

@arenella1 · Mexico but Boston guy · joined 28 Jun 2014

criminal defense atty, UCLA LAW Professor, proud Democrat, parent of a mentally disabled adut son and LGBTQ daughter, ally 🏳️‍🌈

22 494Followers

3 677Following

30 717Posts total

16.1KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

Professor Peter Arenella@arenella19 Sep

Jim offers a superb and tragically accurate overview of what has happened to our country. While Jim describes most of the damage Trump and his accomplices have caused, his most important point is a reminder that ousting Trump will not alleviate the internal defects that permitted 251 views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Professor Peter Arenella@arenella19 Sep

THANK YOU NOTE TO MY FOREIGN FOLLOWERS: I xso wish more Americans had the finances and time to travel abroad to enhancem their understanding of how some democratic societies take care of their people with mandatory health care, lengthy paid periods to tender to newborn, and a tax 413 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Professor Peter Arenella@arenella18 Sep

Jeff Daniels is a terrific actor; he is even a better human being. He fully understands why our country has lost its way. The mid-terms will tell us whether such losses might be mitigated or frozen into our culture. 3.1K views · 123 likes · 36 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Professor Peter Arenella@arenella18 Sep

“Can religion be reconciled with science? If religion means merely a system of ethics, religion can be reconciled with science. If religion means a system of dogma, regarded as unquestionably true, religion is incompatible with..." rational analysis "which refuses to accept 661 views · 20 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Professor Peter Arenella@arenella18 Sep

An acccurrate description of where we are at this moment in time. 540 views · 8 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Professor Peter Arenella@arenella18 Sep

“Suppressing knowledge, telling people what they must think and what ideas are impermissible, which lines of evidence may not be pursued, is the aperture to thought police, foolish and incompetent decision-making, and long-term decline.” — Carl Sagan https://t.co/URwx8Rgx7E

11.1K views · 644 likes · 255 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. reaches fewer people than peers, but engages them much harder.

Median views600this account1 033median for 10K–100K

Reach, %2.67%this account3.60%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %3.01%this account1.69%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	600	1 033	0.58×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	2.67%	3.60%	0.74×
Engagement rate	3.01%	1.69%	1.78×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

11.1K8 Sep

540

661

3.1K

4139 Sep

251

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

8.19%8 Sep

2.22%

3.63%

5.19%

1.94%9 Sep

2.39%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.69%.

What the audience does

Likes70.7%805 in total

Reposts26.2%298 in total

Replies2.0%23 in total

Bookmarks1.1%13 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

Against accounts of the same size

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Similar accounts