tweetindex
EN

Helen

@fancyhatslady

Woman. Lover of black cats and fancy hats. Vindicated. Not so gender critical my brain has fallen out. Perhaps Girlguiding will reinstate my membership now?

9 915Followers
2 804Following
12 284Posts total
215.9KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

@fancyhatslady @Girlguiding @wontsomeonethi2 Now we need to make the Scouts a single sex organisation again. Boys also deserve their own spaces. 3.8K views · 179 likes · 2 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →
And don’t forget that until placed under pressure from the press, back in 2018/19 Girlguiding was routinely excluded girls who, for whatever reason, did not have a “girl” gender identity. We know from the work of Hannah Barnes and Newsnight just how vulnerable that cohort is 4/ 8.6K views · 569 likes · 31 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Anyway, it only took 8 years, but we did it! And it would never have happened without Katie, the other guiders, Fair Play for Women, countless mumsnetters, all the women who were on to GGHQ before me, the feminists and lawyers who got our arguments right, and supporters. 5/5 8.3K views · 927 likes · 41 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →
Another particular low was presenting the Girls’ Attitudes Survey result of “86% of girls say that trans people shouldn’t be discriminated against” as blanket consent for a unilateral change of policy and end of single sex changing and sleeping facilities 3/ 9.4K views · 630 likes · 30 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The concept that some boys (provided they had a particular gender identity) could be members but not others was a farce that undermined GG’s previous position that it would remain single sex, in the face of pressure to become mixed, because members valued an all female group. 3/ 11K views · 765 likes · 34 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
As of today, @girlguiding is back to being a single sex association for girls (and women leaders). Almost 8 years to the day that Katie @wontsomeonethi2 and I were expelled for holding, as it turned out, beliefs that were entirely consistent with U.K. equality law 1/ 163.2K views · 6K likes · 830 reposts · 121 replies Open on X →
Admittedly, it did take a Supreme Court ruling for the law to be clarified - I will never stop admiring @ForWomenScot, their legal team and supporters for their tenacity and perseverance. 2/ 11.6K views · 1.1K likes · 47 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

7 posts from the last 90 days, next to the under 10K follower range. reaches fewer people than peers, but engages them much harder.

Median views9 447this account4 556median for under 10K
Reach, %95.28%this account290.48%median for under 10K
Engagement, %7.01%this account1.40%median for under 10K
MetricThis accountMedian for under 10KRatio
Median views per post9 4474 5562.07×
Reach (views ÷ followers)95.28%2.9× audience0.33×
Engagement rate7.01%1.40%5.00×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

11.6K7 Sep
163.2K
11K
9.4K
8.3K
8.6K
3.8K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

9.78%7 Sep
4.29%
7.29%
7.00%
11.80%
7.01%
5.10%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.40%.

What the audience does

Likes88.8%10 201 in total
Reposts8.8%1 015 in total
Replies1.4%157 in total
Bookmarks1.0%120 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts