tweetindex
EN

Jarrett Walker ✓

@humantransit

Public transit planning and policy consultant (https://t.co/ZoczdeljM9), author of the book and blog Human Transit. Also literature and plants.

44 625Followers
2 744Following
26 409Posts total
153.8KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

@humantransit The struggle for bus priority is waged month by month, year by year. You could argue it began around 1980 when Washington state got an early start on HOV lanes, setting an example for Seattle/King County to try on arterials in the late '00s. 1.9K views · 24 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@MayorofSeattle But she wouldn't be able to do so much if the city bureaucracy wasn't already aligned around a commitment to transit (which is essential given their commitment to be a dense and walkable city). Thank the 2012 Seattle Transit Plan for that. 10/10 5K views · 148 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
Now, the @MayorofSeattle is a former transit advocate, Katie Wilson. So of course she's making some more aggressive choices to add bus lanes even where they will really inconvenience motorists. That's democracy. 9/ 5.2K views · 134 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Many mayors have come and gone in that time, with varying levels of political interest in transit. But the policy commitment has been constant, and the Seattle Transit plan is what put that commitment in place. 8/ 5K views · 92 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Ever since, Seattle has been rolling out very aggressive street redesigns, mostly around a set of quasi-BRT frequent bus axes called RapidRide. They are reallocating space to transit because it's their priority. 7/ 5.2K views · 122 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
But everything is different if it is CITY policy telling the CITY traffic engineer to make things work for transit, because transit is the CITY's priority even if the City doesn't run it. That's the reset that the Seattle Transit Plan did. 6/ 5.8K views · 145 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
How does the City staffer respond? Usually by treating the transit agency as just another user of the street asking them for something. It's too easy to say no. 5/ 5.6K views · 85 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Every day in America, a transit planner calls up a city traffic engineer asking for help with a problem. Could you remove this on-street parking space so we can make this turn? Can you help us move this bus stop from here to there? 5/ 6.2K views · 102 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The City needed to feel that it owned the transit system even if it legally didn't, so that it could plan dense redevelopment around the frequent lines in confidence that they would always be there. And fortunately, the county transit leaders saw the win-win. 4/ 6.4K views · 115 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Why? Because Seattle knew that their future depended on excellent transit. That meant they had to stop treating the county transit agency as just another "stakeholder" or "government partner". 3/ 7K views · 136 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
In the early 2000s I was part of the design team for the Seattle Transit Plan. This was unprecedented. The City didn't control the transit system, the county did. But the City made its own transit plan anyway. 2/ 7.6K views · 151 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Visitors to Seattle are often amazed by the excellence of the bus system and especially the high quality of transit priority. Most people "have very little idea how this happened." Well, here's how it happened. 1/ 92.8K views · 835 likes · 67 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

12 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown far beyond its own audience, and the audience reacts.

Median views5 718this account924median for 10K–100K
Reach, %12.81%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %1.95%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post5 7189246.19×
Reach (views ÷ followers)12.81%3.62%3.54×
Engagement rate1.95%1.52%1.28×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

92.8K25 Aug
7.6K
7K
6.4K
6.2K
5.6K
5.8K
5.2K
5K
5.2K
5K
1.9K

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.00%25 Aug
2.05%
1.99%
1.84%
1.70%
1.57%
2.55%
2.38%
1.91%
2.61%
3.10%
1.32%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes84.8%2 089 in total
Reposts3.6%88 in total
Replies1.7%41 in total
Bookmarks9.9%245 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts