tweetindex
EN

Han Xiao

@hxiao · Sunnyvale, CA · joined 05 Apr 2009

VP, AI @Elastic prev: founder & ceo @JinaAI_

20 793Followers
280Following
6 065Posts total
27.4KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

This is actually Nevada. https://t.co/DlgyoVIYHb 220 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Fallen leaf lake https://t.co/fVYQRxLEIU 521 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Sugar pine point / Lake Tahoe https://t.co/5phYTeJeq6 1.1K views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@hxiao I just switched from @claude_code to @PrimeIntellect's prime agent which is built with RLM in mind. My session has been running for 50h with Qwen3.8 Flash and the token usage is way better than what CC was doing. CC outputted ~4.5M token while processing 360M vs ~2.3M fo 460 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The second is 24h & 9 laps. Same pi harness, but the model is qwen-3.8-27b-nvfp4 by @radixark on a ½ RTX6K on GCP CloudRun. 9 laps with the longest ran >14h without steering or nudging. The swimlane looks less clean than the 1st tho, bc the run got interrupted a couple of times h 1.4K views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
anyway, I think this is a pretty fun experiment: a reality-check of pi + self-hosted models to run long-horizon tasks. Overall it's usable, and I'm thinking about offloading some my less competitive chores to this stack. An individual with unmetered intelligence can unlock a lot 809 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Sharing two long-horizon sessions on pi + self-hosted models. first: 16 hours long, zero steering, 99 laps. I used pi + local models to port our upcoming Jina model from bf16 PyTorch into MLX+MTP quants (model J in the sequel). The local model is qwen3.8-flash-next-omlx-q4 from h 20K views · 310 likes · 14 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →
thought it's hallucinating, but turns out to be true, they did release qwen-3.7-text-embedding but seems api only https://t.co/HgZQ4r0Str 3K views · 13 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

8 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views948this account966median for 10K–100K
Reach, %4.56%this account3.66%median for 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.84%this account1.51%median for 10K–100K
MetricThis accountMedian for 10K–100KRatio
Median views per post9489660.98×
Reach (views ÷ followers)4.56%3.66%1.25×
Engagement rate0.84%1.51%0.56×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3K2 Sep
20K3 Sep
809
1.4K
4604 Sep
1.1K
5215 Sep
220

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.54%2 Sep
1.70%3 Sep
0.37%
0.81%
0.87%4 Sep
1.20%
1.54%5 Sep
0.45%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.51%.

What the audience does

Likes50.1%358 in total
Reposts2.2%16 in total
Replies2.8%20 in total
Quotes0.3%2 in total
Bookmarks44.6%319 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts