tweetindex
EN

Neetu Arnold

@neetu_arnold

Wife • Education @ManhattanInst • Exposing education’s blind spots • Views mine

7 575Followers
1 490Following
6 085Posts total
3.7MViews on collected posts

Latest posts

@neetu_arnold The issue isn't just a few "equity" policies. This is the tail end of a 30-year movement starting from Jeannie Oakes's fraudulent research, and it will end in America turning into South Africa. 558 views · 27 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
University of Michigan’s new grade covering policy seems less about mental health and more about accommodating poor admissions decisions More in @CityJournal: https://t.co/QKeCBwBqqi 397 views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Building “early momentum” became central to U-M’s student success strategy. In fact, grade covering is designed to build “early momentum” According to Angela Dillard, the student success movement isn’t about “blaming students for being unprepared;” it’s about placing “blame on h
404 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Most U-M students graduate But black and Hispanic students graduated 10-20% below U-M’s overall 4-year rate And over the past decade, U-M increased its share of black & Hispanic students, particularly after it stopped uniformly requiring standardized tests for admission https:
396 views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Ahead of this seminar, U-M administrators were well aware they had a problem on their hands A 2023 report found DFW (Ds, Fs, Withdrawals) rates highest in foundational courses. And these rates showed “intersectional patterns of inequity” Students who struggle early are less htt
383 views · 10 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Other presentation slides discuss “radically rethinking grading practices for undergraduates” in the first 1-2 years & that U-M should “consider moving away from competitive grading” https://t.co/taWCTmiI6t
425 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
In 2024, U-M held a seminar to discuss strategies to improve first-year “student success” At this seminar, Angela Dillard, Vice Provost of Undergrad Ed, asked “why don’t we blow up the transcript?” https://t.co/6NidI2ABfW
0:19
596 views · 8 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
🧵 “Why don’t we blow up the transcript?” University of Michigan documents show “covering grades” was part of a larger conversation about rethinking grades, “inequities”, & moving away from competitive grading Here’s what I found https://t.co/iTj8mzKYRx
25.3K views · 118 likes · 34 reposts · 21 replies Open on X →
Is “mental health” really why the University of Michigan will hide freshmen grades on transcripts? University documents tell a different story My latest in @CityJournal ⬇️ https://t.co/QKeCBwBqqi 45.7K views · 318 likes · 63 reposts · 24 replies Open on X →
Do “covering grades” work? 133.3K views · 342 likes · 21 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →
For all those who see “covering grades” on transcripts as helping first-year students: In 2016, Johns Hopkins reversed its 40+-year policy bc it did more harm than good - Delayed students from adapting to college-level work -Could place students at a disadvantage when applying
166.8K views · 237 likes · 30 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
@neetu_arnold The University of Michigan also has 17 “reflection rooms” and a “wellness zone” with massage chairs and light therapy to address its students’ “mental health.” This is infantilization. 56.8K views · 1.2K likes · 67 reposts · 41 replies Open on X →
Oh wow 😬 University of Michigan will HIDE first-semester grades on transcripts for students in the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts It’s to “curb the mental health crisis” AND The policy is mandatory for all students bc “covering an individual’s grades will https:
3.2M views · 5K likes · 742 reposts · 864 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

13 posts from the last 90 days, next to the under 10K follower range. reaches fewer people than peers, but engages them much harder.

Median views596this account2 020median for under 10K
Reach, %7.87%this account148.09%median for under 10K
Engagement, %1.88%this account1.42%median for under 10K
MetricThis accountMedian for under 10KRatio
Median views per post5962 0200.30×
Reach (views ÷ followers)7.87%148.09%0.05×
Engagement rate1.88%1.42%1.32×

Others in this range →   Compare with another account →   How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3.2M6 Aug
56.8K
166.8K
133.3K
45.7K17 Aug
25.3K19 Aug
596
425
383
396
404
397
55820 Aug

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.23%6 Aug
2.40%
0.17%
0.28%
0.91%17 Aug
0.72%19 Aug
1.85%
1.88%
3.13%
2.78%
1.98%
3.27%
5.38%20 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.42%.

What the audience does

Likes63.7%7 320 in total
Reposts8.4%964 in total
Replies8.6%983 in total
Quotes6.6%760 in total
Bookmarks12.7%1 463 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Similar accounts