Pierre Ferragu ✓

@p_ferragu · Planet Earth · joined 03 Apr 2018

Commenting on technology - no investment advice. Proud producer of https://t.co/2o6yVCO1My

132 280Followers

97Following

4 057Posts total

868.4KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

Pierre Ferragu ✓@p_ferragu13 Sep

100% It is a brute force problem. Humain brain cannot stand the complexity load. All but doomsday super intelligence. (Albeit impressive and very cool, of course.) 4.8K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Pierre Ferragu ✓@p_ferragu13 Sep

Nice one 9.5K views · 57 likes · 0 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Pierre Ferragu ✓@p_ferragu13 Sep

finding the navier stokes singularity is in some sense much easier than doing your job end to end 73.7K views · 1.8K likes · 48 reposts · 90 replies Open on X →

Pierre Ferragu ✓@p_ferragu12 Sep

I’d actually see a c), Martin. c) This is frontier tech and as such potentially dangerous. Not going for it flat out is not an option; the free rider is what it is. Someone will. So go for it flat out and learn how to defend yourself, from it and (most importantly) with it. 6.2K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Pierre Ferragu ✓@p_ferragu12 Sep

This entire discussion is just so ludicrous a) if you believe it is existentially dangerous, put in actual controls with a real regulatory body. Lock that shit down. b) if you don’t, chill the fuck out. Or treat like the Internet c) there is no c I’m solidly in (b). 74.5K views · 958 likes · 71 reposts · 80 replies Open on X →

Pierre Ferragu ✓@p_ferragu9 Sep

The attitude here is childish and irresponsible... or planned and coordinated with a nasty agenda. The position here is equivalent to lobbying for not developing the bomb during the war because the bomb is dangerous, and letting the Germans or the Japanese do it first. (and don’t 11K views · 92 likes · 6 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →

Pierre Ferragu ✓@p_ferragu27 Feb 2023

Model 2 is critical to the continued success of $TSLA, and we should learn a lot more this week about it. Here is an overview of what we expect in 4 slides.👇 688.7K views · 2.1K likes · 308 reposts · 195 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

6 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 100K–1M follower range. shown widely, but few of those viewers react.

Median views10 272this account6 239median for 100K–1M

Reach, %7.76%this account1.72%median for 100K–1M

Engagement, %0.82%this account1.10%median for 100K–1M

Metric	This account	Median for 100K–1M	Ratio
Median views per post	10 272	6 239	1.65×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	7.76%	1.72%	4.51×
Engagement rate	0.82%	1.10%	0.74×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

688.7K27 Feb

11K9 Sep

74.5K12 Sep

6.2K

73.7K13 Sep

9.5K

4.8K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.37%27 Feb

0.99%9 Sep

1.49%12 Sep

0.14%

2.63%13 Sep

0.65%

0.27%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.10%.

What the audience does

Likes81.8%4 986 in total

Reposts7.1%433 in total

Replies6.3%385 in total

Bookmarks4.7%288 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

Against accounts of the same size

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Similar accounts