Pedro Gomes ✓

@pedrouid · Portugal · joined 14 Sep 2012

Founder & Director @WalletConnect

25 958Followers

2 106Following

23 089Posts total

47.3KViews on collected posts

Latest posts

Pedro Gomes ✓@pedrouid5 Sep

From Summer 2025 to Summer 2026... ... GPT 5.0 evolved to GPT 6.0 ... Claude 4.1 evolved to Claude 5.1 ... Grok 4.0 evolved to Grok 4.6 ... Gemini 2.5 evolved to Gemini 3.8 12 months in AI is almost as crazy as Crypto 😅 535 views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Pedro Gomes ✓@pedrouid5 Sep

Say it louder for those on the back 📢 1.2K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Pedro Gomes ✓@pedrouid5 Sep

Ethereum 1.1K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Pedro Gomes ✓@pedrouid5 Sep

Never thought I would live to see the Mercator map getting deprecated 😅 But seriously can we prioritize getting rid of DST first which is way more urgent! https://t.co/aXKXaUwkIv 660 views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Pedro Gomes ✓@pedrouid5 Sep

Ethereum 5.7K views · 40 likes · 1 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Pedro Gomes ✓@pedrouid25 Aug

@pedrouid “responsibility displacement” is a pretty good way to frame it 328 views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →

Pedro Gomes ✓@pedrouid24 Aug

@pedrouid > wallets negotiate each chain's transaction capabilities 7702 had every structural advantage a standard could ask for (single spec, enshrined in-protocol, zero migration cost, wallet vendors incentivized to ship) and a year after Pectra, adoption still trails what the 196 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Pedro Gomes ✓@pedrouid24 Aug

@pedrouid Pedro has been a major patron of EIP 8141 (frame transactions), so him switching his support to the competing EIP 8130, which Base backs, is notable. 658 views · 11 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Pedro Gomes ✓@pedrouid24 Aug

After spending months on EIP-8141... I’m convinced EIP-8130 is the better path for native account abstraction It’s simpler, more portable, and focused on what wallets actually need! https://t.co/7M8HxK0miD 37K views · 109 likes · 14 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Against accounts of the same size

9 posts from the last 90 days, next to the 10K–100K follower range. reaches fewer people than peers of the same size.

Median views660this account924median for 10K–100K

Reach, %2.54%this account3.62%median for 10K–100K

Engagement, %1.66%this account1.52%median for 10K–100K

Metric	This account	Median for 10K–100K	Ratio
Median views per post	660	924	0.71×
Reach (views ÷ followers)	2.54%	3.62%	0.70×
Engagement rate	1.66%	1.52%	1.09×

Others in this range → Compare with another account → How these benchmarks are built →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

37K24 Aug

658

196

32825 Aug

5.7K5 Sep

660

1.1K

1.2K

535

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.38%24 Aug

1.82%

2.04%

9.15%25 Aug

0.82%5 Sep

1.52%

1.66%

1.21%

1.87%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes68.2%229 in total

Reposts4.8%16 in total

Replies8.6%29 in total

Quotes3.6%12 in total

Bookmarks14.9%50 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Latest posts

Against accounts of the same size

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Similar accounts